Re: [Fwd: Latest kernel stable/longterm status]

2012-01-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:24:08PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb: --=-GV+LLjr9UIrWlGGcGT1j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We need to make a decision soon on whether

Re: [Fwd: Latest kernel stable/longterm status]

2012-01-17 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb: --=-GV+LLjr9UIrWlGGcGT1j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We need to make a decision soon on whether we will use Linux 3.2 for wheezy or wait for a later release. Whichever one we choose, we need

Re: [Fwd: Latest kernel stable/longterm status]

2012-01-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:24:08PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb: --=-GV+LLjr9UIrWlGGcGT1j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We need to make a decision soon on whether we will use Linux 3.2

Re: [Fwd: Latest kernel stable/longterm status]

2012-01-12 Thread Rik Theys
Hi, I'm just an end-user but personally I would prefer to see Wheezy release with a more recent kernel than 3.2. If Wheezy freezes in June linux 3.4 might already be released. When Wheezy releases there will be a 3.5 and likely even a 3.6. Having a more recent kernel (like 3.4) will result

Re: [Fwd: Latest kernel stable/longterm status]

2012-01-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 22:00:47 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: So my humble opinion, as user, is that 3.2 seems the best choice. Also, it is a newer kernel than 3.0, and this generally means more features and better support for newer devices. 3.0 was never an option AIUI. The

Re: [Fwd: Latest kernel stable/longterm status]

2012-01-10 Thread Marcus Osdoba
Am 10.01.2012 02:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: We need to make a decision soon on whether we will use Linux 3.2 for wheezy or wait for a later release. Whichever one we choose, we need to make sure someone (possibly one of us) maintains a longterm branch for it. I am strongly disinclined to

Re: [Fwd: Latest kernel stable/longterm status]

2012-01-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:46:10PM +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: Am 10.01.2012 02:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: We need to make a decision soon on whether we will use Linux 3.2 for wheezy or wait for a later release. Whichever one we choose, we need to make sure someone (possibly one of us)

[Fwd: Latest kernel stable/longterm status]

2012-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
We need to make a decision soon on whether we will use Linux 3.2 for wheezy or wait for a later release. Whichever one we choose, we need to make sure someone (possibly one of us) maintains a longterm branch for it. I am strongly disinclined to choose a version that puts us on our own, and