On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 08:30 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:02:35AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I have another proposal, and it involves symlinks. Simon has shown that
> > using
> > symlinks inside svn is fully supported by svn, so let's try that.
>
> This is incorrect.
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 08:26 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Hu? It disappeared without notice.
> > If I'd been working on the tree at the time, I probably would've whined
> > then too.
>
> The development version disappeared.
>
> >
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 03:33:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Indeed. The idea was to move 2.6.14 to sid, and make the out-of-git tree the
> > main development tree, which was exactly what *YOU* where advocating post
> > 2.6.12, so
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:56:39AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Indeed. The idea was to move 2.6.14 to sid, and make the out-of-git tree the
> main development tree, which was exactly what *YOU* where advocating post
> 2.6.12, so i don't understand what you are complaining about.
I advocated using
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:31:24AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:20:24AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > It was announced in #debian-kernel.
>
> So? This is without notice.
Indeed, we probably need a policy of 24h advance warning on debian-kernel
mailing list, does
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:30:56AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:02:35AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I have another proposal, and it involves symlinks. Simon has shown that
> > using
> > symlinks inside svn is fully supported by svn, so let's try that.
>
> This is inc
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:20:24AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> It was announced in #debian-kernel.
So? This is without notice.
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
-- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:02:35AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> I have another proposal, and it involves symlinks. Simon has shown that using
> symlinks inside svn is fully supported by svn, so let's try that.
This is incorrect. Symlinks are dumb pointers.
> The plan goes as follows :
> /dists
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > Hu? It disappeared without notice.
> If I'd been working on the tree at the time, I probably would've whined
> then too.
The development version disappeared.
> A little more ranting... I don't like that we're using a temporal layou
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 00:23 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:46:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Please stop with these unannounced (and seemingly arbitrary) moves.
> > > They add unnecessary confusion
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:46:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > Please stop with these unannounced (and seemingly arbitrary)
> > moves. They add unnecessary confusion and I (and likely others)
> > find it frustrating.
>
> Hu? It disappeared without notice.
It was announ
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 12:03 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > A little more ranting... I don't like that we're using a temporal layout
> > because it means moves are always happening. svn lets us move stuff,
> > which is a great
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
[snip]
> A little more ranting... I don't like that we're using a temporal layout
> because it means moves are always happening. svn lets us move stuff,
> which is a great feature, but the way we're using it is an abuse of this
> feat
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 00:23 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:46:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > Please stop with these unannounced (and seemingly arbitrary) moves.
> > They add unnecessary confusion and I (and likely others) find it
> > frustrating.
>
> Hu? It disappe
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:46:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Please stop with these unannounced (and seemingly arbitrary) moves.
> They add unnecessary confusion and I (and likely others) find it
> frustrating.
Hu? It disappeared without notice.
Bastian
--
But Captain -- the engines can't
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 15:36 +, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Author: waldi
> Date: 2005-11-06 15:36:29 + (Sun, 06 Nov 2005)
> New Revision: 4732
>
> Added:
>dists/trunk/linux-2.6/
> Removed:
>dists/sid/linux-2.6/
> Log:
> There is no newer version.
Bastian,
Please stop with these unann
16 matches
Mail list logo
