On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 18:33 +0200, Martin S. wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 10:38 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 April 2010 17:39, Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org wrote:
Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 10:38 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 April 2010 17:39, Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org wrote:
Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
[SNIP]
Is anyone prepared to commit to including a
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 April 2010 17:39, Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org wrote:
Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
Why can't ipheth just depend on libimobiledevice-utils ? It *is* a
functional dependency after all, even if
On 27 April 2010 17:39, Julien BLACHE jbla...@debian.org wrote:
Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
Why can't ipheth just depend on libimobiledevice-utils ? It *is* a
functional dependency after all, even if they're not communicating
directly with each other.
The ipheth-dkms
Martin S. i...@sukimashita.com wrote:
Hi,
Why not add an udev rule to the ipheth package which checks for the
USBMUX_SUPPORTED flag and the ipheth module being added, then calls
the idevicepairing tool to pair?
Thus the ipheth module would simply depend on
libimobiledevice-tools/-utils and
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 00:38 +0200, L. Alberto Giménez wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:55:53AM +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
In order for the udev rule to execute *any* application which performs
the pairing, that application must exist in some package. That package
will need to be a
On 27 April 2010 10:47, Martin S. i...@sukimashita.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 00:38 +0200, L. Alberto Giménez wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:55:53AM +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
In order for the udev rule to execute *any* application which performs
the pairing, that application must
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 April 2010 10:47, Martin S. i...@sukimashita.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 00:38 +0200, L. Alberto Giménez wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:55:53AM +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
In order for the udev rule to
On 27 April 2010 14:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 April 2010 10:47, Martin S. i...@sukimashita.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 00:38 +0200, L. Alberto Giménez wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
How about this then libimobiledevice-utils supplying the udev rule
and pairing utility, and providing a virtual package which Provides:
ipheth-support? Maybe the provides bit is not required...
Why can't ipheth just depend on
Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
Why can't ipheth just depend on libimobiledevice-utils ? It *is* a
functional dependency after all, even if they're not communicating
directly with each other.
The ipheth-dkms package will disappear because ipheth has been accepted
upstream and
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:39:46PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Olivier Galibert galib...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
Why can't ipheth just depend on libimobiledevice-utils ? It *is* a
functional dependency after all, even if they're not communicating
directly with each other.
The
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:55:53AM +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
In order for the udev rule to execute *any* application which performs
the pairing, that application must exist in some package. That package
will need to be a dependency of usbmuxd (unless usbmuxd provides it).
It cannot simply be
2010/4/22 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:09 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
[...]
1. Keep the ipheth-utils package and drop ipheth-dkms when ipheth
makes it into the mainline kernel. Given that mainline
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/22 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:09 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
[...]
1. Keep the ipheth-utils package and drop ipheth-dkms
On 24 April 2010 08:00, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/22 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:09 +0100, Paul McEnery
Was was the final decision of merging the small util into one of the
other packages and the udev rules into usbmuxd?
This was discussed a few weeks ago, but I don't recall anyone being in
overwhelming support of the idea. I'm not sure that usbmuxd should
have *libimobiledevice-utils* as a
On 24 April 2010 11:01, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Was was the final decision of merging the small util into one of the
other packages and the udev rules into usbmuxd?
This was discussed a few weeks ago, but I don't recall anyone being in
overwhelming support of the idea. I'm
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:09 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
[...]
1. Keep the ipheth-utils package and drop ipheth-dkms when ipheth
makes it into the mainline kernel. Given that mainline inclusion could
take a while, users (of Debian at
On 3 April 2010 22:11, L. Alberto Giménez agime...@sysvalve.es wrote:
On 04/02/2010 10:09 PM, Paul McEnery wrote:
[...]
Without wanting to say anything on
Bradley's behalf, it appeared as if he was in support of the tethering
driver being implemented in kernel space. That said, and given the
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 21:20 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
snip
Hi Martin.
Thanks for your input on this. I know there was a brief discussion on
the topic of a kernel vs user space tethering driver, and speed was
one of the topics. I recall a few claims being made about how much
faster kernel
On 04/02/2010 10:09 PM, Paul McEnery wrote:
[...]
Without wanting to say anything on
Bradley's behalf, it appeared as if he was in support of the tethering
driver being implemented in kernel space. That said, and given the
maturity of ipheth, would it be fair to say that ipheth is the way
On 04/01/2010 10:20 PM, Paul McEnery wrote:
Ben, one of the reasons that I was slow to respond to the call to
integrate ipheth into the mainline kernel is that I don't believe that
it belongs there. It's far too dependent on other bits and pieces in
order to function. It requires the user
On 2 April 2010 15:11, L. Alberto Giménez agime...@sysvalve.es wrote:
On 04/01/2010 10:20 PM, Paul McEnery wrote:
Ben, one of the reasons that I was slow to respond to the call to
integrate ipheth into the mainline kernel is that I don't believe that
it belongs there. It's far too dependent
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:09 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
[...]
1. Keep the ipheth-utils package and drop ipheth-dkms when ipheth
makes it into the mainline kernel. Given that mainline inclusion could
take a while, users (of Debian at least) could start to benefit almost
immediately since all of
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 April 2010 14:07, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Paul,
I missed you talking about ipheth on IRC earlier.
I've seen the submission of ipheth on the netdev mailing list, and made
some comments on it there.
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 14:30 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
On 1 April 2010 14:07, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Paul,
I missed you talking about ipheth on IRC earlier.
I've seen the submission of ipheth on the netdev mailing list, and made
some comments on it there. If it is
On 1 April 2010 18:23, Martin S. i...@sukimashita.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 14:30 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
On 1 April 2010 14:07, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Paul,
I missed you talking about ipheth on IRC earlier.
I've seen the submission of ipheth on the netdev
wrote:
From: Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libimobiledevice-devel] ipheth
To: Martin S. i...@sukimashita.com
Cc: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk, Julien BLACHE
jbla...@debian.org, libimobiledevice-de...@lists.libimobiledevice.org,
Debian kernel team debian-kernel
, 4/1/10, Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paul McEnery pmcen...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libimobiledevice-devel] ipheth
To: Martin S. i...@sukimashita.com
Cc: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk, Julien BLACHE
jbla...@debian.org, libimobiledevice-de
30 matches
Mail list logo
