On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 07:17 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 12:01:37PM +0530, intrigeri wrote:
> > In the last month or so, a number of people from various Debian teams
> > and other distributions have been tracking down a regression that
> > affects systems upgraded to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Bug #1050256 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux]
AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
1050256: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050256
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 12:01:37PM +0530, intrigeri wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux
> Control: retitle -1 AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
> Control: affects -1 src:apparmor src:lxc src:systemd src:pdns src:policykit-1
> Control: found
Dear lxd and systemd maintainers,
Michael Biebl (2023-09-11):
> When you do the reassignment, you should probably merge this bug report
> with #1038315 and #1042880, now that we know what the root cause is.
FTR I did not dare merging these myself: perhaps you want to keep
separate bug reports to
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #1050256 [apparmor,lxc] apparmor makes systemd autopkgtests fail on bookworm
Bug reassigned from package 'apparmor,lxc' to 'src:linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1050256 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring requ
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Control: retitle -1 AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
Control: affects -1 src:apparmor src:lxc src:systemd src:pdns src:policykit-1
Control: found -1 6.1.38-1
Control: found -1 6.1.38-2
Control: notfound -1 6.3.1-1~exp1
Hi Debian Kernel Team,
In the last m
6 matches
Mail list logo
