On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
There's a few reports against 2.4 kernel that are fixed in 2.6 and are
unlikely to get in 2.4 every (Examples: #146956 or #130217). How should
we deal with them
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
There's a few reports against 2.4 kernel that are fixed in 2.6 and are
unlikely to get in 2.4
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:57:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Yeah, in the meantime, i need to release a 2.4.26 kernel as there are
people clamoring for it, since the 2.4.25 has some security holes whose
fixes where not backported, and 2.6 is not considered stable by some
users yet (and if you
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 09:53:50AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:51:22 +0200,
Sven Luther wrote:
So, i am seriously considering dropping all 2.4 powerpc kernels, and
going with 2.6 only, and would like to get feedback both from
debian-kernel as well as debian-powerpc,
Hello,
Well, nobody seemed to care or comment on this, so let's take this to a
wider audience.
Christoph has recently told me that he doesn't care about 2.4, and even
benh has mentioned to me that 2.4 support for powerpc will be going away
in the near term (well, not the eact words, but you get
Hi,
Sven Luther writes:
Jens [...] is comaintainer of the 2.4 kernels.
Nope.
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:51:22AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, nobody seemed to care or comment on this, so let's take this to a
wider audience.
Christoph has recently told me that he doesn't care about 2.4, and even
benh has mentioned to me that 2.4 support for powerpc will be going
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:32:43PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:51:22AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, nobody seemed to care or comment on this, so let's take this to a
wider audience.
Christoph has recently told me that he doesn't care about 2.4, and even
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 03:51, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
Well, nobody seemed to care or comment on this, so let's take this to a
wider audience.
Christoph has recently told me that he doesn't care about 2.4, and even
benh has mentioned to me that 2.4 support for powerpc will be going away
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:40:14AM -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 03:51, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
Well, nobody seemed to care or comment on this, so let's take this to a
wider audience.
Christoph has recently told me that he doesn't care about 2.4, and
Well... That isn't really what I said ;) What I said is that I don't
have time to actively maintain the PowerMac support in 2.4, that is make
it evolve support newer machines. That doesn't mean that PPC will be
going away from 2.4 ;)
I think the exact quote was that you are not going
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:01:34PM -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Well... That isn't really what I said ;) What I said is that I don't
have time to actively maintain the PowerMac support in 2.4, that is make
it evolve support newer machines. That doesn't mean that PPC will be
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
There's a few reports against 2.4 kernel that are fixed in 2.6 and are
unlikely to get in 2.4 every (Examples: #146956 or #130217). How should
we deal with them in the BTS?
The real question here is to ask ourselves what is
13 matches
Mail list logo
