Re: 2.6.16.y -stable branch

2006-12-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 01 December 2006 23:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just noticed that Adrian Bunk's stable 2.6.16.y branch has been > removed from Etch, and I think that sucks. Not quite true: Adrian Bunk's tree has never been in Etch. The linux-2.6.16 package contained just the regular 2.6.16 kernel

2.6.16.y -stable branch

2006-12-01 Thread neologix
Hi. I just noticed that Adrian Bunk's stable 2.6.16.y branch has been removed from Etch, and I think that sucks. It's a great opportunity to have a _stable_ and long-supported kernel in Debian, which is really nice for those of us who do not want the latest bugs - oops - features of the fancy Linus