On Tuesday 05 February 2008, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Finally I created the etch-support udeb which does two things:
1) add an early base-installer hook script that sets the 'altmeta'
template
2) add an partman init.d hook script
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Finally I created the etch-support udeb which does two things:
1) add an early base-installer hook script that sets the 'altmeta'
template
2) add an partman init.d hook script that changes the default
inode_size from 256 to 128
* dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-05 01:13]:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:23:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
As suggested by Frans, with many good points, we'll release with
2.6.22 but just after it, we'll start to work to release another beta
with 2.6.24 kernel.
This should
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given we're doing a beta based on 2.6.22 now, how quickly could we get
another beta based on 2.6.24 out? Can you be done relatively quickly
after the beta based on 2.6.22?
I guess we can.
d-i itself isn't receiving deeply changes latelly (except
* Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-05 16:43]:
d-i itself isn't receiving deeply changes latelly (except latest Frans
partman improvements but that has been very well test by him, as
usual) and other minor things. I guess we could do another in begin of
April or so, dunno for sure.
I
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Sorry for the long explanation below, but I really want people to understand
what is happening and why so we are agreed on this implementation and don't
have nasty surprises after the point release.
Your mail (which I read carefully) requires ACK from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With all comments that has been sent to this thread, I've changed the
timeline to the following:
+--+---+
| Date | What happens |
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
I have been quite disappointed that there was no real follow-up to my
mails, which now leaves us in the situation that there is basically no
support yet to select the correct kernel for etch+1/2.
Being the sucker that I am, I did start to look into
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:51:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
It's far to early to switch d-i to 2.6.24, especially since it drops
support for most of /proc/acpi, including the parts used by
laptop-detect.
I suspect you already know this, but for the record, that's not an
intrinsic property of
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:51:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
It's far to early to switch d-i to 2.6.24, especially since it drops
support for most of /proc/acpi, including the parts used by
laptop-detect.
I still think this switch was an extremely premature and really, really
bad idea.
We
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
We have 2.6.22 as a safe bed on lenny now and their udebs are there
too however since EtchAndHalf intends to release with 2.6.24 and it
has been uploaded to sid already I'm considering a better option to
us to release
On Friday 01 February 2008, dann frazier wrote:
Is there anything special we need to add to deal with etch 1/2
kernel metapackages? We were talking about using a name like
linux-image-2.6-686-etchnhalf.
As I explained in my mails re etch+1/2 some time back [1] , D-I simply will
not install
Otavio Salvador wrote:
We have 2.6.22 as a safe bed on lenny now and their udebs are there
too however since EtchAndHalf intends to release with 2.6.24 and it
has been uploaded to sid already I'm considering a better option to
us to release with it.
linux-2.6 has been built
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ Reply-To adjusted to debian-boot so we can keep this discussion in a
single mailing list ]
Hello folks,
I've been working at migrations of packages for lenny and I think
we're more or less fine to define a timeline to the end of Febuary for
the
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:04:23PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
- kernel to release
We have 2.6.22 as a safe bed on lenny now and their udebs are there
too however since EtchAndHalf intends to release with 2.6.24 and it
has been uploaded to sid already I'm considering a better
15 matches
Mail list logo
