On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > However, even if you do use the command line to get around d-i
> > limitations, its still not safe to have /boot on LVM (at least according
> > to all the documentation I've seen).
>
> with lilo it's safe if the LV is create
severity 281905 wishlist
thanks
The EFI format is unfortunately rather misdesigned and has a backup data
area at the end of the devices - which won't be acciable by lots of usb
devices because they have broken size reporting.
This alone wouldn't be a problem if we could simply probe EFI last, but
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Best thing for > 2TB disks is to use LVM anyway
At least as far as d-i is concerned (AFAICT), you have to put LVM on top
of an existing partition table; you can't just use the full /dev/sda or
whatever. (The command-line lets you get around this).
However, even if you do
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:49:54AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> >Best thing for > 2TB disks is to use LVM anyway
>
> At least as far as d-i is concerned (AFAICT), you have to put LVM on top
> of an existing partition table; you can't just use the full /dev/sda
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > At least as far as d-i is concerned (AFAICT), you have to put LVM on top
> > of an existing partition table; you can't just use the full /dev/sda or
> > whatever. (The command-line lets you get around this).
> Yikes. The a st
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 03:24:26PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > At least as far as d-i is concerned (AFAICT), you have to put LVM on top
> > > of an existing partition table; you can't just use the full /dev/sda or
> > > wh
6 matches
Mail list logo