This bug does not exist in the vanilla version of 2.6.8. A patch added
somewhere in the Debian kernel-source-2.6.8 packages breaks it. I,
however, cannot seem to find any patches that should touch smbfs, so I
can't point it out. I just just rebuilt that particular module with the
sources from
Found the offending patch!
It's called smbfs-overflow-fixes.dpatch. I've attached a patch that
should fix the same overflow issues, but without breaking utime
functionality. It's stolen from 2.6.10-ac7. :-)
--
Sren Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:36:27PM +0100, S?ren Hansen wrote:
This bug does not exist in the vanilla version of 2.6.8. A patch added
somewhere in the Debian kernel-source-2.6.8 packages breaks it. I,
however, cannot seem to find any patches that should touch smbfs, so I
can't point it out. I
lr, 08 01 2005 kl. 19:35 +0100, skrev Christoph Hellwig:
When merging to 2.6.10 I noticed we have a bunch of smbfs changes that
were labelled security fixes. Can you try to rebuild the kernel (or
just smbfs.ko) with the patch below reversed?
Just as expected, that cleared it right up. The
4 matches
Mail list logo
