This bug does not exist in the vanilla version of 2.6.8. A patch added
somewhere in the Debian kernel-source-2.6.8 packages breaks it. I,
however, cannot seem to find any patches that should touch smbfs, so I
can't point it out. I just just rebuilt that particular module with the
sources from kerne
Found the offending patch!
It's called smbfs-overflow-fixes.dpatch. I've attached a patch that
should fix the same overflow issues, but without breaking utime
functionality. It's stolen from 2.6.10-ac7. :-)
--
SÃren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/sr
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:36:27PM +0100, S?ren Hansen wrote:
> This bug does not exist in the vanilla version of 2.6.8. A patch added
> somewhere in the Debian kernel-source-2.6.8 packages breaks it. I,
> however, cannot seem to find any patches that should touch smbfs, so I
> can't point it out.
lÃr, 08 01 2005 kl. 19:35 +0100, skrev Christoph Hellwig:
> When merging to 2.6.10 I noticed we have a bunch of smbfs changes that
> were labelled security fixes. Can you try to rebuild the kernel (or
> just smbfs.ko) with the patch below reversed?
Just as expected, that cleared it right up. The
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 03:42:43AM +0100, S?ren Hansen wrote:
> l??r, 08 01 2005 kl. 19:35 +0100, skrev Christoph Hellwig:
> > When merging to 2.6.10 I noticed we have a bunch of smbfs changes that
> > were labelled security fixes. Can you try to rebuild the kernel (or
> > just smbfs.ko) with the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 283241 +pending
Bug#283241: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: 2.6.8 and 2.6.9: utime(2) hangs on smbfs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
6 matches
Mail list logo
