Bug#311185: linux-2.6: Does the Debian Kernel Team still have concerns about CONFIG_PREEMPT ?

2007-12-14 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
the stability != preempt seems no longer true as the preempt path gets more testing out there. I'm running my notebook with full preemption since years now, without any problems. I had to use the -ck patches, though, as the normal preemption did not work well enough for me. I didn't check how

Bug#311185: linux-2.6: Does the Debian Kernel Team still have concerns about CONFIG_PREEMPT ?

2007-12-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:24:15 +0100 maximilian attems wrote: hello francesco, nice to read you! :) Hi Maximilian! Thanks for your quick reply. On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:10:04AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] By reading the bug log, I seem to understand that this is due to

Bug#311185: linux-2.6: Does the Debian Kernel Team still have concerns about CONFIG_PREEMPT ?

2007-12-12 Thread Francesco Poli
Package: linux-2.6 Followup-For: Bug #311185 If I understand the following output correctly, the current (testing) Linux kernel does *not* have any preemption activated: $ grep -i EMPT /boot/config-2.6.22-3-amd64 CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set #

Bug#311185: linux-2.6: Does the Debian Kernel Team still have concerns about CONFIG_PREEMPT ?

2007-12-12 Thread maximilian attems
hello francesco, nice to read you! :) On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:10:04AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: If I understand the following output correctly, the current (testing) Linux kernel does *not* have any preemption activated: $ grep -i EMPT /boot/config-2.6.22-3-amd64