Bug#319657: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: /vmlinuz and /initrd symlinks were botched after installing 2.6.12

2005-07-23 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 23 July 2005 20:47, Andrew Moise wrote: > After installing linux-image, the automatic run of lilo failed. I > found that that had been because my /vmlinuz symlink pointed to > '/boot/-2.6' and my /initrd.img to '/boot/-2.6'. That should probably be '/boot-2.6' in both cases. At leas

Bug#319657: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: /vmlinuz and /initrd symlinks were botched after installing 2.6.12

2005-07-23 Thread Andrew Moise
Just to be clear, regardless of what it _should_ be, it's definitely not correct on my system: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /vmlinuz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2005-07-23 09:56 /vmlinuz -> /boot/-2.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /initrd.img lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2005-07-23 09:56 /initrd.img -

Bug#319657: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: /vmlinuz and /initrd symlinks were botched after installing 2.6.12

2005-07-23 Thread Andrew Moise
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 Version: 2.6.12-1 Severity: normal After installing linux-image, the automatic run of lilo failed. I found that that had been because my /vmlinuz symlink pointed to '/boot/-2.6' and my /initrd.img to '/boot/-2.6'. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing