Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: wishlist
There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
particular arch (eg. kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-i386). This is very useful
for build-depends when autobuilding external module packages.
Such packages seem to no longer ex
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.12-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
> particular arch (eg. kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-i386). This is very useful
> for build-depends when
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.12-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
> > particular arch (eg
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.12-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
> > particular arch (eg
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:50:43AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:37:36AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > >Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
> > > doesn't work too well f
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
> > doesn't work too well for all archs, since we end up w/
> > linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc, which conflicts w/ the name of a flavour.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:54:12AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:50:43AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:37:36AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > >Calli
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:50:43AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:37:36AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > >Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
> > > doesn't work too well f
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:47:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:54:12AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:50:43AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:37:36AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -040
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:07:43AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > linux-headers-2.6.12-1-all (arch: any)
> Will need to exclude Arch: mips mipsel.
linux-2.6 is not buildable on this arches.
Bastian
--
... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get
to know each other.
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
>Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
> doesn't work too well for all archs, since we end up w/
> linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc, which conflicts w/ the name of a flavour.
> Suggestions?
linux-headers
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:37:36AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
> > doesn't work too well for all archs, since we end up w/
> > linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc,
12 matches
Mail list logo