Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2009-02-08 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote: also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com [2009.02.05.0731 +0100]: Both drives are fairly new...Would the drive be defective since day1?

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2009-02-05 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote: also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com [2009.02.05.0731 +0100]: Both drives are fairly new...Would the drive be defective since day1? Was the error log that I am getting now available in previous version of

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2009-02-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com [2009.02.04.0655 +0100]: 3. I then readded my /dev/hda2 to /dev/md2 and a lot of errors started to appear in syslog... [...] Feb 3 23:49:09 hplinux kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Looks like your

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2009-02-04 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
Both drives are fairly new...Would the drive be defective since day1? Was the error log that I am getting now available in previous version of the kernel? Thanks, Lucas On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:12 AM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote: also sprach Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2009-02-03 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Lukasz Szybalski szybal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: fOn Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:16:39PM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: On 10/15/07, Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote: As you say, the devices are

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2009-01-04 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
fOn Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:16:39PM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: On 10/15/07, Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote: As you say, the devices are exactly the same size, thanks. On Monday October 15, szybal...@gmail.com wrote: how do I undo? mdadm /dev/md2 -f /dev/hda2 So I could try

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2009-01-04 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: fOn Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:16:39PM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: On 10/15/07, Neil Brown ne...@suse.de wrote: As you say, the devices are exactly the same size, thanks. On Monday October 15, szybal...@gmail.com

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2007-10-17 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.10.16.0043 +0100]: I was hoping for cat /proc/partitions and maybe even fdisk -l /dev/hda /dev/hdb In the future, consider asking for /usr/share/bug/mdadm/script 31 which should have *all* the output you could ever want. :) In future

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2007-10-17 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On 10/15/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you say, the devices are exactly the same size, thanks. On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do I undo? mdadm /dev/md2 -f /dev/hda2 So I could try the sync in init 1 Lucas Well, you could: mdadm /dev/md2 -f

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2007-10-15 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On 10/12/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday October 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes I have. Then I tried booting in knoppix to see if maybe there are hdd problems so I run e2fsck on both drives to see if there are any issues. reboot and it still does the same thing. Ok,

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2007-10-15 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On 10/15/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: seems as the size is the same? seems. I was hoping for cat /proc/partitions hplinux:/home/lucas# cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 3 0 312571224 hda 3 1

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2007-10-15 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: seems as the size is the same? seems. I was hoping for cat /proc/partitions and maybe even fdisk -l /dev/hda /dev/hdb I should have been more specific. NeilBrown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop

2007-10-15 Thread Neil Brown
As you say, the devices are exactly the same size, thanks. On Monday October 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do I undo? mdadm /dev/md2 -f /dev/hda2 So I could try the sync in init 1 Lucas Well, you could: mdadm /dev/md2 -f /dev/hda2 mdadm /dev/md2 -r /dev/hda2 then when you are