Bug#463253: reopen

2008-02-03 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 03:14:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Btw, this is a reason why I'd suggest to use > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y > CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n > CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y > > for the etch'n half kernel (given that it's 2.6.24). But I'm sure you >

Bug#463253: reopen

2008-02-03 Thread Michael Biebl
maximilian attems wrote: > > ack > it seems that userspaces didn't yet grok up the /sys interface, Btw, this is a reason why I'd suggest to use CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y for the etch'n half kernel (given that it's 2.6.24).

Bug#463253: reopen

2008-02-03 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > reopen 463253 > thanks it doesn't really matter if that one is open as at least another got filed. > please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle > such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people. >

Bug#463253: reopen

2008-02-03 Thread Michael Biebl
maximilian attems schrieb: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle >> such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people. >> I, as co-maintainer of hal, can't immediately come up with a patch. Th

Bug#463253: reopen

2008-02-02 Thread Michael Biebl
reopen 463253 thanks Hi maks, please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people. I, as co-maintainer of hal, can't immediately come up with a patch. This takes time to test and do properly. The right way to do this, is fi