Hi,
I just wonder if there is any update on this one and if the split-out
patch has been proposed to upstream yet.
If you manage to get this upstream, with Linus keeping on distributing
the binary images, debian can well choose not to distribute them, but
debian users can still get the blob somew
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:01:09AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wonder if there is any update on this one and if the split-out
> patch has been proposed to upstream yet.
>
> If you manage to get this upstream, with Linus keeping on distributing
> the binary images, debian can wel
dann frazier writes:
> Kalle: would you mind submitting your patch upstream, if you haven't
> already? A lot of similar patches for other drives have been accepted
> in recent months.
I expect the patch would be rejected because it breaks
SND_CS46XX_NEW_DSP. Do you think otherwise?
Anyway, I h
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:58:15 +0300
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> dann frazier writes:
>
> > Kalle: would you mind submitting your patch upstream, if you haven't
> > already? A lot of similar patches for other drives have been accepted
> > in recent months.
>
> I expect the patch would be reje
Antonio Ospite writes:
> can the latest version of your code be found in this thread?
Yes, the version I posted on 2008-04-06 is the latest one. When
building a local linux-2.6 2.6.26-9.kon.1 version, I put the
patch at debian/patches/debian/dfsg/sound-pci-cs46xx.patch and
added it to the list
On Fri, 01 May 2009 11:16:58 +0300
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Antonio Ospite writes:
>
> > can the latest version of your code be found in this thread?
>
> Yes, the version I posted on 2008-04-06 is the latest one. When
> building a local linux-2.6 2.6.26-9.kon.1 version, I put the
> patc
Antonio Ospite writes:
> About the SND_CS46XX_NEW_DSP issue, from a first glance to
> the driver it looks like that in order to support it we have to make a
> binary image for any file in the imgs/ dir. Does this look ok to you?
I guess that's what needs to be done. The difficulty is with
point
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 21:45 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:01:09AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wonder if there is any update on this one and if the split-out
> > patch has been proposed to upstream yet.
> >
> > If you manage to get this upstream, w
On Mon, 04 May 2009 00:17:03 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 21:45 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> > Kalle: would you mind submitting your patch upstream, if you haven't
> > already? A lot of similar patches for other drives have been accepted
> > in recent months.
>
> Kalle
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 01:35 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2009 00:17:03 +0100
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 21:45 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > >
> > > Kalle: would you mind submitting your patch upstream, if you haven't
> > > already? A lot of similar patch
Ben Hutchings writes:
> - Remove "Modified on..." lines; that's what the commit message is for
Those were the prominent notices mentioned in GPLv2 2. a).
pgpGEfIUch6fL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 08:21 +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>
> > - Remove "Modified on..." lines; that's what the commit message is for
>
> Those were the prominent notices mentioned in GPLv2 2. a).
Right, I see. I believe the Debian patch system makes our changes
On Mon, 04 May 2009 00:55:55 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 01:35 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 May 2009 00:17:03 +0100
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
...
> > > Anyway, here's my proposed patch for unstable (against 2.6.30-rc4) that
> > > deals with the first prob
13 matches
Mail list logo
