* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-28 08:54]:
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-27 07:45]:
If lenny's freeze keeps apex from moving on: Will we need to ask the
release manager?
Yes, in theory we would; but it seems this package isn't frozen yet.
... okay, the new APEX
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-27 07:45]:
If lenny's freeze keeps apex from moving on: Will we need to ask the
release manager?
Yes, in theory we would; but it seems this package isn't frozen yet.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx
which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could
confirm it works.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx
which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could
confirm it works.
Yes, confirmed. It works nicely for me. I re-flashed the old apex from
debian, and set modules=most in
Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx
which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could
confirm it works.
Yes, confirmed. It works nicely for me.
Works great here too.
Kevin Price schrieb:
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
The 2.6.26-rc2 test image is available from
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/armel/kernel/r11383/
The fixed 2.6.25 package will be uploaded in the near future.
At least the 2.6.26-rc2 makes my slug unbootable. Again, I need some
time to hook the
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
The 2.6.26-rc2 test image is available from
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/armel/kernel/r11383/
The fixed 2.6.25 package will be uploaded in the near future.
At least the 2.6.26-rc2 makes my slug unbootable. Again, I need some
time to hook the serial console up to
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 09:15]:
Nothing, I'm afraid; all 2.6.24. There was no disk activity when I
restarted after installing 2.6.25.
Judging by /usr/share/doc/nslu2-utils/README.Debian it didn't even get
as far as starting
* Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 09:15]:
Nothing, I'm afraid; all 2.6.24. There was no disk activity when I
restarted after installing 2.6.25.
Judging by /usr/share/doc/nslu2-utils/README.Debian it didn't even get
as far as starting the initramfs.
hmm, I'm not sure.
Do you
Hi!
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
I just tried (on arm) and it works for me. CCing debian-arm. Anyone
else seeing problems with 2.6.25?
Yes, I can confirm this bug on armel. Thanks Martin fo CCing debian-arm.
In order to reproduce this, I installed 2.6.25-1-ixp4xx_2.6.25-1_armel
onto my
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 13:40]:
Yes, I can confirm this bug on armel. Thanks Martin fo CCing debian-arm.
In order to reproduce this, I installed 2.6.25-1-ixp4xx_2.6.25-1_armel
onto my otherwise complete lenny/armel slug. Since then it fails to boot.
My slug does have a
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
Cool, that'd be great!
Here we go:
Ethernet eth0: MAC address 00:14:bf:65:db:3d
IP: 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0, Gateway: 192.168.0.1
Default server: 0.0.0.0, DNS server IP: 0.0.0.0
RedBoot(tm) bootstrap and debug environment [ROMRAM]
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
Can you show me the output of
ls -l /boot
Are you suspecting the initrd size?
My /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf says MODULES=most, btw.
ls -l /boot
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 748537 Apr 21 22:05 System.map-2.6.24-1-ixp4xx
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 762523 Apr 30
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 15:37]:
Cool, that'd be great!
Here we go:
Thanks.
Can you show me the output of
ls -l /boot
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi again! Problem spotted.
Kevin Price schrieb:
Are you suspecting the initrd size?
My /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf says MODULES=most, btw.
That was the cause. Chaning modules to dep created an initrd.img with
a size of 2176130, which is less than half the size of
-rw-r--r-- 1 root
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 480310 [ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 ramdisk too large
Bug#480310: [ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 fails to boot with 2.6.25
Changed Bug title to `[ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 ramdisk too large' from `[ixp4xx]
armel NSLU2 fails to boot with 2.6.25'.
severity 480310
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 15:54]:
Are you suspecting the initrd size?
Yes, while the NSLU2 has 6 MB for the ramdisk, APEX passes a parameter
to the kernel saying the ramdisk is 4 MB, so everything after 4 MB is
ignored. Your ramdisk is larger than 4 MB, which explains why the
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 16:33]:
ii flash-kernel 1.7utility to write kernel and initramfs
I suggest moving this bug to package flash-kernel. Any objections?
flash-kernel does the right thing, apex-nslu2 doesn't.
Anyway, let's leave this bug open on the
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
Kevin, since you have a serial console, are you interested in testing
the patches in #451882 and #421359?
Yes. My slug is now compiling apex-1.4.15 with the patch from #451882
(CONFIG_RAMDISK_SIZE=0x0050) I am curious if this solves this bug
and I will let you
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 17:43]:
Kevin, since you have a serial console, are you interested in testing
the patches in #451882 and #421359?
Yes. My slug is now compiling apex-1.4.15 with the patch from #451882
(CONFIG_RAMDISK_SIZE=0x0050) I am curious if this solves
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
You'll also need the patch from #421359, otherwise the new APEX is not
written to flash.
Yeah. I was thinking from a more low-level point of view and flashed the
apex binary myself with the script. The result is good: The large initrd
(modules=all) boots fine with
* Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 18:36]:
That was because I dislike the idea about the imaginary version
1.5.14. Is it more appropriate to name it something like 1.5.13+gf1
? I'll give it a try.
I suggest you use 1.5.14~test1; the ~ means that 1.5.14~xxx is smaller
than 1.5.14, so
* Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-10 01:07]:
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-1-ixp4xx
Version: 2.6.25-1
After the usual initial lightshow, the NSLU2 sits there with only the
Ethernet LED illuminated. I have initramfs-tools 0.92a and the initrd
is 1.4MB, so I think that should be
Paul, can you check in /var/log on your hard drive to see if there's
anything useful?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul, can you check in /var/log on your hard drive to see if there's
anything useful?
Nothing, I'm afraid; all 2.6.24. There was no disk activity when I
restarted after installing 2.6.25.
Judging by /usr/share/doc/nslu2-utils/README.Debian it didn't
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-1-ixp4xx
Version: 2.6.25-1
After the usual initial lightshow, the NSLU2 sits there with only the
Ethernet LED illuminated. I have initramfs-tools 0.92a and the initrd
is 1.4MB, so I think that should be mustard. I'm running armel. I have
no serial console, so I
26 matches
Mail list logo
