Your message dated Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:23:56 +0100 with message-id <20100226162356.gb32...@inutil.org> and subject line Re: Bug#540202: include a cron reboot reminder has caused the Debian Bug report #540202, regarding include a cron reboot reminder to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 540202: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=540202 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist Maybe the linux-image packages could install a cron.daily script that compared the currently installed version to /proc/version and sent an e-mail to root in case there's a mismatch, which most likely means that a new kernel exists, but the machine has not been rebooted. Extra bonus for making this debconf configurable. ;) -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systemsdigital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:18:58PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:35:49PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach dann frazier <da...@debian.org> [2009.08.06.1853 +0200]: > > > Any reason this couldn't be fully implemented externally to linux-2.6? > > > The parsing code should be static enough to live outside, I would > > > think. > > > > No reason why it couldn't happen externally. It just seems that the > > linux-image packages are the logical place for it. > > To me, it seems more like an external service. Like you mention, > multiple linux-image packages could be installed at one time, so it > would seem like the logic is something we'd want to factor out into a > single standalone package. Ack. Closing the bug. Cheers, Moritz
--- End Message ---