Is there any chance to get this fix into lenny? AFAIU, this bug may
affect both i386 and amd64, both dom0 and domU [if domU is running
-xen flavour], almost on any hardware with 1 CPUs, and cause system
crash...
Yes, I have added it to the lenny branch.
Hi
I don't see any mention of
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 10:57 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Is there any chance to get this fix into lenny? AFAIU, this bug may
affect both i386 and amd64, both dom0 and domU [if domU is running
-xen flavour], almost on any hardware with 1 CPUs, and cause system
crash...
Yes,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 542250 +patch
Bug #542250 [src:linux-2.6] repeatable crashes while copying 500G from NFS
mount to local logical volume
Bug #516479 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: kernel-panic in
xen_spin_wait an mutlicore dom0 with high
This asserts that if we spin on a lock after interrupting another spin,
and interrupts are enabled, we must be in a softirq.
Looking at the bottom of the same file drivers/xen/core/spinlock.c:
void xen_spin_kick(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned int token)
{
unsigned int cpu;
tags 542250 +patch
thanks
... I may guess that line 74 should check for in_interrupt() instead of
in_softirq().
I've tried that and it really fixed the problem. Server already runs the
same backup procedure for several hours. Previously it crashed within 15
minutes.
Here is the patch I've
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 542250 +patch
Bug #542250 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64] repeatable crashes while copying
500G from NFS mount to local logical volume
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:36 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
tags 542250 +patch
thanks
... I may guess that line 74 should check for in_interrupt() instead of
in_softirq().
I've tried that and it really fixed the problem. Server already runs the
same backup procedure for several
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:36 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
tags 542250 +patch
thanks
... I may guess that line 74 should check for in_interrupt() instead
of in_softirq().
I've tried that and it really fixed the problem. Server already runs
the same backup procedure for
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-17lenny2
Severity: normal
I'm running several servers (Dual Core AMD Opteron, 16G of ram) with
Xen.
Dom0 is debian lenny adm64.
Today I tried to run a large backup in dom0 - copy NFS-mounted partition
to a local volume group.
buki:~# cd
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:38 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-17lenny2
Severity: normal
I'm running several servers (Dual Core AMD Opteron, 16G of ram) with
Xen.
Dom0 is debian lenny adm64.
Today I tried to run a large backup
X-Loop
ow...@bugs.debian.org: Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:24:04 +
Resent-Message-ID: handler.542250.b542250.12506521281...@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Sender: ow...@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 542250
X-Debian-PR-Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
11 matches
Mail list logo