Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-17lenny2
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Hi,
according to http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1862 this Version of the
2.6.26-2 Kernel should
not be vulnerable to CVE-2009-2692.
Unfortunately I'm still ab
* Christoph Siess:
> Correct my if I got something wrong, but according to my
> understanding this shouldn't be possible with version
> 2.6.26-17lenny2.
Correct.
> Linux version 2.6.26-2-686 (Debian 2.6.26-17lenny1) (da...@debian.org) (gcc
> version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:00:49PM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Christoph Siess:
>
>
> > Linux version 2.6.26-2-686 (Debian 2.6.26-17lenny1) (da...@debian.org) (gcc
> > version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Sun Jul 26
> > 21:25:33 UTC 2009
>
> But it seems you are r
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:45:20PM +0200, Christoph Siess wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
> Version: 2.6.26-17lenny2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> Justification: root security hole
>
>
> Hi,
>
> according to http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1862 this Version of the
>
Christoph Siess writes:
> I'm very, sorry - I forgot to run lilo :(.
Maybe #535331 should get a security tag? It does deserve to get fixed
both in lenny and etchnhalf IMHO, so the severity should be increased at
some point. But I was kind of hoping that the kernel team would just
add the build
* Christoph Siess [2009-09-02 14:57-0400]:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
> Version: 2.6.26-17lenny2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> Justification: root security hole
>
>
> Hi,
>
> according to http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1862 this Version of the
> 2.6.26-2 Kernel shou
6 matches
Mail list logo