* Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:33:21PM -0500, Jon Bernard wrote:
> > * License : LGPL 2.1
>
> Please elaborate how a part of a GPL 2 licensed source (Linux kernel)
> can be LGPL 2.1.
The code is "compatible" in that it provides identical functionality in
userland, bu
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:33:21PM -0500, Jon Bernard wrote:
> * License : LGPL 2.1
Please elaborate how a part of a GPL 2 licensed source (Linux kernel)
can be LGPL 2.1.
Bastian
--
We have phasers, I vote we blast 'em!
-- Bailey, "The Corbomite Maneuver", stardate 1514.
2 matches
Mail list logo