On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 09:25:19PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
...
> Confirm that removing this module restores boot.
>
> This is excellent detective work. If I might ask, how did you trace
> the module loads and successful inits?
Dave,
Besides hacking in printk's, often "initcall_debug" ker
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 21:25 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> This is excellent detective work. If I might ask, how did you trace
> the module loads and successful inits?
Heh, you're expecting me to name magic tracing tools? Well (shuffles
feet) I just put printks in kernel/modules.c to do it.
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 10:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > It's most likely a driver module that's getting loaded which is turned
> > off in the booting configuration ... finding it isn't going to be easy,
> > though ...
>
> Finally got a build (ha
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 20:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 14:28 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I traced the module loads and successful inits and found it; it's
> > pata_cmd64x ... it loads but never returns from init. I bet it's
> > trying to poke into ISA space which ca
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 14:28 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 10:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > It's most likely a driver module that's getting loaded which is turned
> > off in the booting configuration ... finding it isn't going to be easy,
> > though ...
>
> Finally go
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 10:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> It's most likely a driver module that's getting loaded which is turned
> off in the booting configuration ... finding it isn't going to be easy,
> though ...
Finally got a build (had to swap out -Os for -O2).
I traced the module loads an
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Comparing the console output that I recorded for the debian kernel, I
> > see udev starts much earlier. It only has the initial message from the
> > tg3 driver and SCSI subsystem.
>
> It's most likely a driver module that's getting loaded which is
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 11:11 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 19:35 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > > Strike that one ... I enabled USB in my 2.6.39-rc3 build and it inserts
> > > > the OHCI module and discovers
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 19:35 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > Strike that one ... I enabled USB in my 2.6.39-rc3 build and it inserts
> > > the OHCI module and discovers the ports just fine.
> >
> > Boot 2.6.39-rc3 fails for me with attac
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 19:35 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > Strike that one ... I enabled USB in my 2.6.39-rc3 build and it inserts
> > the OHCI module and discovers the ports just fine.
>
> Boot 2.6.39-rc3 fails for me with attached config.
I
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> If you can identify the compiler patches required, I can ask the Debian
> gcc maintainers to apply them.
gcc-4.4.6 is released and contains all parisc patches known to be relevant.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin dave.ang...@n
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 15:48 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 15:29 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 14:07 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > > I posted this debian bug report because the most recent debian
> > > > SMP kernel build fails to boot on
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 15:29 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 14:07 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > I posted this debian bug report because the most recent debian
> > > SMP kernel build fails to boot on my rp3440:
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 14:07 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > I posted this debian bug report because the most recent debian
> > SMP kernel build fails to boot on my rp3440:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622997
> >
> > I don't think debian kernels have worked since lenny
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 13:57 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 14:07 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > I posted this debian bug report because the most recent debian
> > SMP kernel build fails to boot on my rp3440:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622997
> >
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 14:07 -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> I posted this debian bug report because the most recent debian
> SMP kernel build fails to boot on my rp3440:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622997
>
> I don't think debian kernels have worked since lenny.
Hmm, well
I posted this debian bug report because the most recent debian
SMP kernel build fails to boot on my rp3440:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622997
I don't think debian kernels have worked since lenny.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin dave.ang...@nrc-cnrc.
17 matches
Mail list logo
