Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-06-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 00:39 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: tag 627837 patch thanks i've updated aufs in my own kernel tree, feel free to merge: http://vcs.progress-linux.org/?p=packages/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff; h=26a2fd380e516f1df527c0357334eb5e10cdccb3

Re: Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-30 Thread Bjørn Mork
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net writes: On 05/29/2011 10:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't see a reason to override their decision. so no change after squeeze, the release team gives a shit about breaking

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/25/2011 12:54 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: i hereby request that: * the release team overwrites the maintainers 'decision' to downgrade #627837 from severity serious to important by marking #627837 RC by restoring the severity to serious * the release team makes sure that 2.6.39 does *not*

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 19:18:29 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 05/25/2011 12:54 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: i hereby request that: * the release team overwrites the maintainers 'decision' to downgrade #627837 from severity serious to important by marking #627837 RC by restoring the

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/29/2011 08:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Then work with the kernel team to resolve this, and make sure what you need is ready in the future when a new kernel is released, instead of making others chase external patches for you. it has always been ready, that's not the problem. --

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 20:27:31 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 05/29/2011 08:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Then work with the kernel team to resolve this, and make sure what you need is ready in the future when a new kernel is released, instead of making others chase external patches for

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/29/2011 09:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Maybe it was ready in your mind, but it wasn't in debian-kernel svn or mailing list (and as far as I can tell the kernel maintainers even checked aufs git before the .39 upload, and didn't find any recent changes there). So yeah, that's exactly

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/29/2011 10:04 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: no; aufs.git was up2date. in time. way before. oh.. and before you ask.. 'way before' means 'at least 2011-04-18, but possibly even earlier' (yes, that really is a month before .39 was released). -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3,

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
severity 627837 serious quit Daniel Baumann wrote: oh.. and before you ask.. 'way before' means 'at least 2011-04-18, but possibly even earlier' (yes, that really is a month before .39 was released). I don't see the value of this discussion --- it's water under the bridge, anyway. I'm

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 15:28:18 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I'm setting the severity to serious, even though I am neither part of the release team nor a maintainer for the package. Either should of course feel free to set it back. The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
severity 627837 important quit Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 15:28:18 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I'm setting the severity to serious, even though I am neither part of the release team nor a maintainer for the package. Either should of course feel free to set it back.

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:16:40PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 05/29/2011 10:04 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 05/29/2011 09:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Maybe it was ready in your mind, but it wasn't in debian-kernel svn or mailing list (and as far as I can tell the kernel maintainers

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/29/2011 10:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't see a reason to override their decision. so no change after squeeze, the release team gives a shit about breaking debian-live, sigh. but don't worry, from now on, i will not care anymore

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Will Set
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.netMay 29, 2011 5:18:27 PM On 05/29/2011 10:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: The maintainers have already made that call, and I don't see a reason to override their decision. so no change after squeeze, the release team gives a shit about

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 22:04 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 05/29/2011 09:53 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Maybe it was ready in your mind, but it wasn't in debian-kernel svn or mailing list (and as far as I can tell the kernel maintainers even checked aufs git before the .39 upload, and didn't

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/30/2011 04:16 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Is there a new canonical repository for aufs? it always was http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/pub/scm/aufs/aufs2-standalone.git, like referenced from aufs.sf.net. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email:

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-24 Thread Daniel Baumann
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: serious Hi, in 2.6.39, apparently aufs was silently dropped, please re-enable. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet:

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-24 Thread Daniel Baumann
tag 627837 patch thanks i've updated aufs in my own kernel tree, feel free to merge: http://vcs.progress-linux.org/?p=packages/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff; h=26a2fd380e516f1df527c0357334eb5e10cdccb3 http://vcs.progress-linux.org/?p=packages/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-24 Thread Daniel Baumann
to prevent further severity ping-pong.. Given that: * 2.6.39 without aufs nor unionmount is not usable in *any* way for debian-live and thus debian-live being completely broken * 2.6.38 has aufs and is in testing * debian-live being a part of debian where we should not release

Bug#627837: linux-2.6: Aufs apparently silently dropped, breaking debian-live

2011-05-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 00:39 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: tag 627837 patch thanks i've updated aufs in my own kernel tree, feel free to merge: http://vcs.progress-linux.org/?p=packages/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff; h=26a2fd380e516f1df527c0357334eb5e10cdccb3