Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (21/01/2012):
After logging into GNOME, I started getting LOTS of
[ 239.494761] [drm:intel_prepare_page_flip] *ERROR* Prepared flip multiple
times
in kernel log repeated ever few microseconds.
Kernel log = kernel bug. :) Reassigning.
No. Please
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (21/01/2012):
After logging into GNOME, I started getting LOTS of
[ 239.494761] [drm:intel_prepare_page_flip] *ERROR* Prepared flip multiple
times
in kernel log repeated ever few microseconds.
Kernel log = kernel bug. :)
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (21/01/2012):
Sorry to waste your time. My tongue was in cheek when I said kernel
log = kernel bug, and I apologize for that.
The problem is not the tongue in cheek. The problem is your fiddling
with that bug report while there are (AFAICT) no reasons to
(-cc: Witold)
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
The problem is not the tongue in cheek. The problem is your fiddling
with that bug report while there are (AFAICT) no reasons to reassign it
to the kernel. Kernel maintainers have better things to do. Me too.
Ok, sorry about that. My choice was reassign a
Saturday, January 21, 2012 4:17 AMJonathan Nieder wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (21/01/2012):
After logging into GNOME, I started getting LOTS of
[ 239.494761] [drm:intel_prepare_page_flip] *ERROR* Prepared flip multiple
times
in kernel log repeated
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (21/01/2012):
(-cc: Witold)
(that's not what I see, fixing)
Ok, sorry about that. My choice was reassign a kernel bug concerning
the same problem to libdrm or the libdrm bug to the kernel, or to
leave them unmerged. I should have said so, I guess.
Saturday, January 21, 2012 5:20 AMCyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
a couple of my installs ( syslogs ) grew to several GiB`s
for the two weeks of so I noticed this page_flip spamming on my old
i865g stuff.
Back to the original topic: it is very difficult for Intel techs to
support old (and I'm
Will Set debiandu...@yahoo.com (21/01/2012):
Saturday, January 21, 2012 5:20 AMCyril Brulebois wrote:
Back to the original topic: it is very difficult for Intel techs to
support old (and I'm just echo-ing their views on hardware) hardware,
even if older versions of the x driver might have
8 matches
Mail list logo