Bug#673496: [lenny -> squeeze regression] wifi broken (?) (Re: Bug#673496: It's alive, Jim.)

2012-06-16 Thread Paul Zimmerman
- Original Message - Jonathan Nieder wrote: >Do I understand correctly that when you say "the machine recognizes > it again" at [1] you are talking about the squeeze kernel, then? Yes, the standard i386 Squeeze kernel is what I have been using. Trying to use the backported kernel fro

Bug#673496: [lenny -> squeeze regression] wifi broken (?) (Re: Bug#673496: It's alive, Jim.)

2012-06-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 18:18 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > > Paul Zimmerman wrote: > > > The 3.2 kernel can't load X, but locks up solid, so I've never gotten the > > chance to try. When I started in "recovery" mode I tried to find the card > > and it didn't show up. So 1 out of 1 times i

Bug#673496: [lenny -> squeeze regression] wifi broken (?) (Re: Bug#673496: It's alive, Jim.)

2012-06-15 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Paul Zimmerman wrote: > The 3.2 kernel can't load X, but locks up solid, so I've never gotten the > chance to try. When I started in "recovery" mode I tried to find the card > and it didn't show up. So 1 out of 1 times it didn't detect it -- when in > recovery mode. Are there things related