przypadek wrote:
> dpkg-deb: budowanie pakietu "linux-headers-3.2.12" w
> "../linux-headers-3.2.12_3.2.12-8_i386.deb".
Um, you're rebuilding the kernel from source[1]?
Is the stock kernel broken too, or does this bug only affect
self-compiled kernels? If the latter, did you remember to install
W dniu 29.08.2012 18:23, Jonathan Nieder pisze:
> przypadek wrote:
>> W dniu 28.08.2012 23:04, Jonathan Nieder pisze:
>>> Sure, can you reproduce this using kmod instead of module-init-tools?
> [...]
>> Yes I probably can if you tell me how.
> By installing kmod and removing the module-init-tools p
W dniu 29.08.2012 18:23, Jonathan Nieder pisze:
> przypadek wrote:
>> W dniu 28.08.2012 23:04, Jonathan Nieder pisze:
>>> Sure, can you reproduce this using kmod instead of module-init-tools?
> [...]
>> Yes I probably can if you tell me how.
> By installing kmod and removing the module-init-tools p
przypadek wrote:
> W dniu 28.08.2012 23:04, Jonathan Nieder pisze:
>> Sure, can you reproduce this using kmod instead of module-init-tools?
[...]
> Yes I probably can if you tell me how.
By installing kmod and removing the module-init-tools package and
trying again.
Make sure you have kmod insta
W dniu 28.08.2012 23:04, Jonathan Nieder pisze:
> przypadek wrote:
>
>> xorg version: 1:7.5+8
>>
>> I was thinking what else i did, and i remind my self that meantime
>> kernel compilation, there was a massage that I maybe need packet
>> module-init-tools, and I installed it. Maybe that is a proble
przypadek wrote:
> xorg version: 1:7.5+8
>
> I was thinking what else i did, and i remind my self that meantime
> kernel compilation, there was a massage that I maybe need packet
> module-init-tools, and I installed it. Maybe that is a problem?
Sure, can you reproduce this using kmod instead of m
xorg version: 1:7.5+8
I was thinking what else i did, and i remind my self that meantime
kernel compilation, there was a massage that I maybe need packet
module-init-tools, and I installed it. Maybe that is a problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On Die, 2012-08-28 at 08:03 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Die, 2012-08-28 at 07:47 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> przypadek wrote:
>
> >>> [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
> >>> [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.
> >>
On 28.08.2012 17:03, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Dawid, could you provide a full kernel log ("dmesg" output) from
> booting a woorking and a non-working kernel?
>
> Sorry for the confusion,
> Jonathan
No I can't, because I checked old kernel, and now is also working
I removed this modeset option from
Hi,
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2012-08-28 at 07:47 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> przypadek wrote:
>>> [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
>>> [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.
>>
>> It sounds like it is slightly out of date [...]
>
> Not necessari
On Die, 2012-08-28 at 07:47 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> przypadek wrote:
>
> > I have installed linux-image-3.2.0-3-686-pae , xserver-xorg-video-radeon
>
> What version of xserver-xorg-video-radeon do you have?
>
> [...]
> > [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
> >
przypadek wrote:
> I have installed linux-image-3.2.0-3-686-pae , xserver-xorg-video-radeon
What version of xserver-xorg-video-radeon do you have?
[...]
> [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
> [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.
It sounds like it is sligh
12 matches
Mail list logo
