On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 19:26 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I think it would be better to add an unconditional warning, rather than
> an error, when there is < 1% free space left. I realise this will be
> easy to ignore but it's still better than an unnecessary failure.
OK, makes sense. Here's what
On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 17:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 20:59 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > That implies we want to allow for about 1% growth
> > from the size in the .0 release.
>
> I'm considering something like this. What do you think?
>
> diff --git a/debian/bin/build
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 20:59 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> That implies we want to allow for about 1% growth
> from the size in the .0 release.
I'm considering something like this. What do you think?
diff --git a/debian/bin/buildcheck.py b/debian/bin/buildcheck.py
index a6f6f06..5bb815c 100755
---
On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 18:09 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 07:57 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 20:59 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [...]
> > > I misread earlier - kirkwood is about 2.5 KB below the limit, not < 1.
> > > Anyway, both kirkwood and orion5x h
On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 07:57 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 20:59 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > I misread earlier - kirkwood is about 2.5 KB below the limit, not < 1.
> > Anyway, both kirkwood and orion5x have much less than 1% of growth room
> > and ixp4xx has slightly l
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 20:59 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I had originally planned to switch QNAP over for 3.16 but it wasn't
> > quite ready upstream (I've forgotten why). The board files went away in
> > 3.17 so in experimental (v3.18) appending is necessary. Once I've worked
> > out some kinks
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #772983 [src:linux] kirkwood kernel image is too big
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> retitle -1 armel kernel images are close to size limits
Bug #772983 [src:linux] kirkwood kernel image is too big
Changed Bug title to 'armel ke
Control: severity -1 important
Control: retitle -1 armel kernel images are close to size limits
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 19:36 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 18:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 3.16.7-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > The kirkwood
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 18:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 3.16.7-2
> Severity: serious
>
> The kirkwood and orion5x kernel images generally have to be installed
> in flash partitions with a fixed size. Currently we check at build
> time that vmlinuz is small enough t
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.7-2
Severity: serious
The kirkwood and orion5x kernel images generally have to be installed
in flash partitions with a fixed size. Currently we check at build
time that vmlinuz is small enough to fit. However, these platforms
now require Device Tree blobs, and th
10 matches
Mail list logo
