Bug#926967: Don't recommend irqbalance (was: Re: Handling irqbalance in virtual environments)

2019-04-12 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: src:linux Version: 4.19.28-2 Severity: important On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:10:32PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 10:53 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > It turns out we got again problems with irqbalance. > > > > It was added as recommends of the main image in 3.16,

Bug#926967: Don't recommend irqbalance (was: Re: Handling irqbalance in virtual environments)

2019-04-14 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:56:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 10:53 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > It turns out we got again problems with irqbalance. > > > > > > It was added as recommends of the main image in 3.16, as it was reported > > > that older kernels move al

Bug#926967: Don't recommend irqbalance (was: Re: Handling irqbalance in virtual environments)

2019-04-23 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: severity -1 serious On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:56:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Then let's drop the recommendation. > Okay. After re-evaluating, I'll consider that a blocker. Regards, Bastian -- The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play.

Processed: Re: Bug#926967: Don't recommend irqbalance (was: Re: Handling irqbalance in virtual environments)

2019-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #926967 [src:linux] Don't recommend irqbalance (was: Re: Handling irqbalance in virtual environments) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 926967: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926967 Debian Bug Tracking System