Re: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)

2008-02-06 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 05 February 2008, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > Finally I created the etch-support udeb which does two things: > > 1) add an early base-installer hook script that sets the 'altmeta' > >template > > 2) add an partman init.d hook s

Re: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)

2008-02-05 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Finally I created the etch-support udeb which does two things: > 1) add an early base-installer hook script that sets the 'altmeta' >template > 2) add an partman init.d hook script that changes the default >inode_size from 256 to

Re: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)

2008-02-04 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Sorry for the long explanation below, but I really want people to understand > what is happening and why so we are agreed on this implementation and don't > have nasty surprises after the point release. Your mail (which I read carefully) requires ACK fr

D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)

2008-02-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > I have been quite disappointed that there was no real follow-up to my > mails, which now leaves us in the situation that there is basically no > support yet to select the correct kernel for etch+1/2. Being the sucker that I am, I did start to look int