* Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-27 17:29]:
There's a few reports against 2.4 kernel that are fixed in 2.6 and
are unlikely to get in 2.4 every (Examples: #146956 or #130217).
How should we deal with them in the BTS?
Is there any chance of those fixes being backported to 2.4 and
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-27 17:29]:
There's a few reports against 2.4 kernel that are fixed in 2.6 and
are unlikely to get in 2.4 every (Examples: #146956 or #130217).
How should we deal with them in the
There's a few reports against 2.4 kernel that are fixed in 2.6 and are
unlikely to get in 2.4 every (Examples: #146956 or #130217). How should
we deal with them in the BTS?
* Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040627 17:40]:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
There's a few reports against 2.4 kernel that are fixed in 2.6 and are
unlikely to get in 2.4 every (Examples: #146956 or #130217). How should
we deal with them in the BTS?
4 matches
Mail list logo