Generally speaking, our requirements for equipment to be used as
buildd/porter
machines are as follows:
* reliability - The stable release manager requires that we operate
three machines for each port: two buildd machines in different
locations and one porter machine. These machines must
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:29:12PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
We have to start somewhere, however. Having equipment on which to build, is a
good start. I'll let the release team and the buildd team decide what to
build, when and where. My goal is meet the supportability / reliability
My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
for development purposes means that we don't have easy means to keep
testing for example kernel upgrades.
Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
debian would work on the calxeda platform.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
debian would work on the calxeda platform. We're one of calxedas partners
and have specific customers who would really love to see debian working on
ours/calxedas
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:56:51AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
for development purposes means that we don't have easy means to keep
testing for example kernel
Hello David,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Would http://packages.debian.org/jessie/linux-image-3.9-1-vexpress by
any chance be a valid kernel image for the highbank? I see in the git
logs of Linus's tree that there is a v7 multiplatform config that is
supposed to cover the
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 05:16:11PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I am of course not in any way official Debian anything, just a long time
user of Debian on many architectures and machine types, but I think I
have a decent understanding of how things work.
We have to start somewhere, however.
Hello,
2013/6/27 Luca Filipozzi lfili...@debian.org:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:56:51AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
for development purposes means that we don't
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 17:16 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
debian would work on the calxeda platform. We're one of calxedas partners
and have specific customers
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:30:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
The impression I got during the brief from the arm porters is that it is
so far unclear how well Debian will run on this nice shiney thing.
So for now it's just a
Hello,
2013/4/26 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Hector Oron wrote:
* DSA hat: The machine shall not be a debian.org machine, so DSA could
export accounts if requested.
* Buildd hat: The machine shall not be used to run buildd software to
build official packages.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
reject the offer, it makes it very interesting as a
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 10:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
reject the offer, it makes it very interesting as a playground
machine. However, let me make some points here:
* ARM
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
To be a useful porter machine, it would be nice if all DD can have access
to it. But if it's not administrated by DSA, I don't know if the newly
announced self-served chroot service can be setup on this machine.
Neither of these require the machine
Hello,
2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
reject the offer, it makes it very interesting as a
Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Hector Oron wrote:
* DSA hat: The machine shall not be a debian.org machine, so DSA could
export accounts if requested.
* Buildd hat: The machine shall not be used to run buildd software to
build official packages.
Did you get those answers from the relevant teams? Was
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we
Hello,
OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian. I believe it would make a
relatively fast ARM autobuilder or porter box. The specs of the hardware (4GB
RAM, 500 GB SATA drives, 4 Cortex A9 cores at 1.1 to 1.4 GHz)
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 05:16:19PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello,
OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian. I believe it would make a
relatively fast ARM autobuilder or porter box. The specs of the
21 matches
Mail list logo
