On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:43:08AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:33:52AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Please find below a patch for 2.6.18, which should also apply to all
> > pre- x86/x86-64 merge 2.6 kernels.
>
> No, it does not.
>
Oops I've sent the wrong patch.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:43:08AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:33:52AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Please find below a patch for 2.6.18, which should also apply to all
> > pre- x86/x86-64 merge 2.6 kernels.
> No, it does not.
But I have a variant which seems to wo
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:33:52AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Please find below a patch for 2.6.18, which should also apply to all
> pre- x86/x86-64 merge 2.6 kernels.
No, it does not.
Bastian
--
The idea of male and female are universal constants.
-- Kirk, "Metamorphosis",
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 469058 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10
Bug#469058: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
found 469058 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10
thanks
Please find below a patch for 2.6.18, which should also apply to all
pre- x86/x86-64 merge 2.6 kernels.
Aurelien
commit d72de04eb1a0269fd37d1edefe03d6d0
Author: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Mar 5 18:59:11 2008 +0100
x86: Clear
5 matches
Mail list logo