Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-12-08 Thread Miles Bader
Ian Jackson writes: >> The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: >> 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' > > I'm still running the machine below, and it would be irritating to > have to replace it. ... > vendor_id : CentaurHauls > cpu family: 6 > model

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-27 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2011/11/23 Matthias Klose : > On 11/19/2011 11:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> (Later it should be increased >> further, and eventually i386 should be reduced to a partial architecture >> that may be installed on amd64 systems.)  This would allow the use of >> optimisations and new instruct

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-23 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:20:11PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have > long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors > and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. > > I think it is time to increase

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 00:44 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 11/19/2011 11:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have > > long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors > > and now require a minimum of a 486-class

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-23 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Goswin von Brederlow] > Where the relevant patches added to binutils and gcc for this? See for yourself: http://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Matthias Klose writes: > On 11/19/2011 11:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have >> long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors >> and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. >> >> I think it is ti

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/20/2011 01:08 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:42:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have >> long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors >> and now require a minimum of a 4

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/19/2011 11:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have > long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors > and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. > > I think it is time to increase the minimum requi

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:47:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ben Hutchings writes ("Increasing minimum 'i386' processor"): > > The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: > > 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' >

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 22 novembre 2011, vers 18:28, Bastian Blank disait : >> > The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: >> > 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' >> I'm still running the machine below, and it would be irritating to >> have

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Ben Hutchings writes ("Increasing minimum 'i386' processor"): > The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: > 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' I'm still running the machine below, and it would be irritating to have

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:47:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ben Hutchings writes ("Increasing minimum 'i386' processor"): > > The 486-class processors that would no longer be supported are: > > 1. All x86 processors with names including '486' > I

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-21 Thread jidanni
How does one do a simple test to see if one is on the death list? # grep -c 86 /proc/cpuinfo 0 # lshw | grep -c 86 0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread David Goodenough
On Sunday 20 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 19:43 +, David Goodenough wrote: > > On Sunday 20 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 10:10 +, David Goodenough wrote: > > > > On Saturday 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > The i386 architec

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 19:43 +, David Goodenough wrote: > On Sunday 20 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 10:10 +, David Goodenough wrote: > > > On Saturday 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread David Goodenough
On Sunday 20 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 10:10 +, David Goodenough wrote: > > On Saturday 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have > > > long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 10:10 +, David Goodenough wrote: > On Saturday 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have > > long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors > > and now require a minimum of a 486-cl

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 19, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think it is time to increase the minimum requirement to 586-class, if > not for wheezy then immediately after. I agree, it's time to weight the costs and benefits of supporting obsolete hardware at the expense of most users. > (Later it should be increased > f

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Guillem Jover writes: > Hi! > > On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:42:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have >> long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors >> and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. >>

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-20 Thread David Goodenough
On Saturday 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have > long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors > and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. > > I think it is time to increase the minimum requ

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Also possibly: > 6. DM&P/SiS Vortex86 and Vortex86SX. These supposedly have all >586-class features except an FPU, and we could probably keep FPU >emulation for them. FWIW, I do run Debian on such systems albeit with a custom kernel. Given those

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-19 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:42:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have > long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors > and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. > > I think it is time to increas

Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
The i386 architecture was the first in Linux and in Debian, but we have long since dropped support for the original i386-compatible processors and now require a minimum of a 486-class processor. I think it is time to increase the minimum requirement to 586-class, if not for wheezy then immediately