Bastian Blank writes:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:47:25PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> If I've diagnosed this correctly, I see several possible options to fix
>> this:
>>
>> a. dpkg excludes packages with Package-Type: debug from the Binary
>>field
>> b. dak ignores packages ending -dbgsym i
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 19:07 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:47:25PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > If I've diagnosed this correctly, I see several possible options to fix
> > this:
> >
> > a. dpkg excludes packages with Package-Type: debug from the Binary
> > field
> >
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:47:25PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> If I've diagnosed this correctly, I see several possible options to fix
> this:
>
> a. dpkg excludes packages with Package-Type: debug from the Binary
>field
> b. dak ignores packages ending -dbgsym in the Binary field.
> c. dak'
There seems to be a problem with the new-style dbgsym packages for the
kernel. On (almost?) every upload, they are treated as NEW whether or
not there has been an ABI change leading to package name changes.
I think this explains it:
1. dak treats an upload as NEW if not all packages in the Binar
4 matches
Mail list logo