Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Kernel Team, http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System

Re: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello Kernel Team, > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings > > The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what > the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ? Only if we can find a way

Re: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 03:43:40AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello Kernel Team, > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings > > The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what > the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ? the decisions will

Re: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-08 Thread Kees Cook
Hi, On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:23 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what > > the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ? > > Only if we can find a way to

Re: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-08 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:31:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:23 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what > > > the decision has been ma

Re: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-08 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:13:02PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the memory used > for its code and static data if it was not used (similar to the way init > code is discarded after boot). Right, this is an upstream limitation of the LSM wh

Re: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-09 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:13 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:31:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:23 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > > The wiki lists most items marked as

Re: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 10:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:13 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:31:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:23 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, R

Bug#598408: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2011-01-15 Thread intrigeri
Hi, ( For the record, more discussion followed on the debian-kernel list. Ben Hutchings made[0] the "discardable" part explicit there: By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the memory used for its code and static data if it was not used (similar to the way init

Bug#598408: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2011-01-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 04:29 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > ( > For the record, more discussion followed on the debian-kernel list. > Ben Hutchings made[0] the "discardable" part explicit there: > > By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the > memory used for its