Hello Kernel Team,
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings
The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what
the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ?
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello Kernel Team,
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings
>
> The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what
> the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ?
Only if we can find a way
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 03:43:40AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello Kernel Team,
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings
>
> The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what
> the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ?
the decisions will
Hi,
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:23 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what
> > the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ?
>
> Only if we can find a way to
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:31:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:23 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what
> > > the decision has been ma
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:13:02PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the memory used
> for its code and static data if it was not used (similar to the way init
> code is discarded after boot).
Right, this is an upstream limitation of the LSM wh
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:13 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:31:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:23 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > > The wiki lists most items marked as
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 10:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:13 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:31:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:23 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, R
Hi,
(
For the record, more discussion followed on the debian-kernel list.
Ben Hutchings made[0] the "discardable" part explicit there:
By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the
memory used for its code and static data if it was not used
(similar to the way init
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 04:29 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (
> For the record, more discussion followed on the debian-kernel list.
> Ben Hutchings made[0] the "discardable" part explicit there:
>
> By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the
> memory used for its
10 matches
Mail list logo