On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 22:03 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2010-05-30, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > --=-1Uqh6s9o6AYhAoAmU++l
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > I understand that only a few kernel team members will be attendi
On 2010-05-30, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> --=-1Uqh6s9o6AYhAoAmU++l
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> I understand that only a few kernel team members will be attending
> DebConf 10. (I will not.) Therefore I think it would be useful to
>
I understand that only a few kernel team members will be attending
DebConf 10. (I will not.) Therefore I think it would be useful to
arrange a real-life team meeting on some other occasion.
It was very useful to meet upstream and other distribution developers at
LPC last year, it was also quite
* Steve McIntyre [2009-08-11 11:55]:
> * Womble2 says yes
> * waldi says yes
> * jmm says "no, but don't worry about me"
> * tbm not sure (please get back to me)
Sorry, I won't be able to make it.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:50:26PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> So, how's everybody getting on with organising their trip?
Working on it.
>I'm told
> that prices for the conf go up again at the end of the month, so if
> you haven't alr
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:50:26PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> So, how's everybody getting on with organising their trip? I'm told
> that prices for the conf go up again at the end of the month, so if
> you haven't already sorted that out then please do so ASAP. Steve also
> just mentioned that
So, how's everybody getting on with organising their trip? I'm told
that prices for the conf go up again at the end of the month, so if
you haven't already sorted that out then please do so ASAP. Steve also
just mentioned that the hotel rooms at the Marriott may be expensive,
so if you want to stay
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:42:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:23:17AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Do you think it could be useful for me to join the RL meeting?
> > I don
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:02:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > * dannf says yes
> > * Womble2 says yes
> > * waldi says yes
> > * jmm says "no, but don't worry about me"
> > * tbm not sure (please get back to me)
> > * luk might come along too if useful (please say so!)
> someone fro
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:42:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:23:17AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Do you think it could be useful for me to join the RL meeting?
> >
> >
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:23:17AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Do you think it could be useful for me to join the RL meeting?
>
> I don't think this is a good idea.
Release management is one of our (the kernel
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:11:34PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> Assuming that works for maks, then we should get organised. As far as
> >> I can tell for the others:
> >> * dannf says yes
> >> * Womble2 says yes
> >> * waldi says yes
> >> * jmm says "no, but don't worry about me"
> >> *
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:55:18AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Assuming that works for maks, then we should get organised. As far as
> I can tell for the others:
>
> * dannf says yes
> * Womble2 says yes
> * waldi says yes
> * jmm says "no, but don't worry about me"
> * tbm not sure (pleas
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:02:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:55:18AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> OK, cool. Any word on that?
>
>yes free, thanks for asking back..
Excellent. :-)
>> Assuming that works for maks, then we should get organised. As far as
>> I
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:23:17AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Do you think it could be useful for me to join the RL meeting?
I don't think this is a good idea.
Bastian
--
It is a human characteristic to love little animals, especially if
they're attractive in some way.
> > That sounds like a good thing to go on the agenda for a RL meeting, in
> >> > fact...
> >> >
> >> > I've not heard anything from anybody else yet, except Dann. Anybody?
> >>
> >> I'm certainly interested in this.
> >
&
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:42:39PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Aug 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:24 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> [...]
>> > That sounds like a good thing to go on the agenda for a RL meeting, in
>> &g
Please make your participation clear to the "announcement" for the
>>>> release plan change. This was not in any way communicated before with
>>>> the directly affected and the infrastructure teams (security, d-i, kde,
>>>> gnome and kernel) or the dev
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:30:18AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've had it suggested that a good place for a meetup would be at the
> Linux Plumbers Conference [1] in Portland next month.
I would also like to attend.
Bastian
--
Is truth not truth for all?
-- Natira, "For the
o the "announcement" for the
> >>release plan change. This was not in any way communicated before with
> >>the directly affected and the infrastructure teams (security, d-i, kde,
> >>gnome and kernel) or the developers at all. If it is not necessary to
> &
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:24 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> [...]
> > That sounds like a good thing to go on the agenda for a RL meeting, in
> > fact...
> >
> > I've not heard anything from anybody else yet, excep
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:24 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
> That sounds like a good thing to go on the agenda for a RL meeting, in
> fact...
>
> I've not heard anything from anybody else yet, except Dann. Anybody?
I'm certainly interested in this.
Ben.
--
Ben
ated before with
>>the directly affected and the infrastructure teams (security, d-i, kde,
>>gnome and kernel) or the developers at all. If it is not necessary to
>>discuss changes, then a RL meeting is wrongly used time.
>
>I knew of discussions going on with the Ubuntu fol
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In the kernel BoF from DebConf, people generally agreed that it would
> be a good plan to organise a real-life meeting. I'm more than happy to
> spend Debian funds to make that happen, if needed.
> Where are people located, and what
nome and kernel) or the developers at all. If it is not necessary to
>discuss changes, then a RL meeting is wrongly used time.
I knew of discussions going on with the Ubuntu folks about the
possibility of freezing together, but the exact timing for the freeze
that was chosen was a surprise to
participation clear to the "announcement" for the
release plan change. This was not in any way communicated before with
the directly affected and the infrastructure teams (security, d-i, kde,
gnome and kernel) or the developers at all. If it is not necessary to
discuss changes, then a RL meet
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In the kernel BoF from DebConf, people generally agreed that it would
> be a good plan to organise a real-life meeting. I'm more than happy to
> spend Debian funds to make that happen, if needed.
>
> Where are people located, and wh
In the kernel BoF from DebConf, people generally agreed that it would
be a good plan to organise a real-life meeting. I'm more than happy to
spend Debian funds to make that happen, if needed.
Where are people located, and what would be convenient time(s) and
location(s) for travel?
--
Steve McIn
28 matches
Mail list logo
