On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:10 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:43:42PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >until fairly recently; we've gotten conflicting answers ranging from "We
> >should provide kernel updates and the security team will use them
> >verbatim"
>
> generally the
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:10:38PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:43:42PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >until fairly recently; we've gotten conflicting answers ranging from "We
> >should provide kernel updates and the security team will use them
> >verbatim"
>
> genera
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:43:42PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
until fairly recently; we've gotten conflicting answers ranging from "We
should provide kernel updates and the security team will use them
verbatim"
generally the security team at least glances at what's released in a
dsa.
to "D
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 13:54 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:07:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. However it seems that
> >working with the security team on this is difficult -
> >lack of response being a primary issue.
>
> What response do you wa
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:07:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. However it seems that
working with the security team on this is difficult -
lack of response being a primary issue.
What response do you want? I sent a message 2 months ago asking how
kernel updates were bei
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:07:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
plan to redo the d-i boot stuff (aiui), so d-i will boot the old 3.1r0
kernels, while it will install the 3.1r1 kernels (it would be better to
talk to him to clarify this, however).
Will the boot kernel actually be upgraded in this case?
M
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:55:12AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:07:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >
> > With regards to an ABI bump, to be honest I am dubious that we can ever
> > make an ABI update. It would probably be just as easy to jump to a
> > whole new kernel (2.6.8
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:07:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> With regards to an ABI bump, to be honest I am dubious that we can ever
> make an ABI update. It would probably be just as easy to jump to a
> whole new kernel (2.6.8 -> 2.6.12?), which is something that we should
> seriously consider.
An
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:11:29PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:40:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> >> > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> >
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:40:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
>> > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
>> > place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
>> >
Hi Horms,
On Monday, 01 Aug 2005, Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 11:43]:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:42]:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:01]:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Yes, that was about my intention as well. So, yes, please move fo
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:01]:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Yes, that was about my intention as well. So, yes, please move forward
> > > with 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 and send a list of
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:01]:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Yes, that was about my intention as well. So, yes, please move forward
> > with 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 and send a list of recommended updates.
> I need to go through the BTS and see what els
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 11:43]:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> > > > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> > > > pl
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 11:43]:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> > > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> > > place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
> > > S
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> > place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
> > Sarge? This would allow us to remove these kernels from
* Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
> Sarge? This would allow us to remove these kernels from unstable/testing
> and still provide maintenence releases for users.
Hi,
I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
Sarge? This would allow us to remove these kernels from unstable/testing
and still provide maintenence releases for users.
On a related note, I am sifting thought the bug
19 matches
Mail list logo
