On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:32:36AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
current open issues (please add if you know more):
- bcm43xx ?backports?
- hp amd64 acpi blacklists
I don't see any follow-ups from anyone adding more. How about these two
issues in particular -- is there any
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:36:32AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
quick update on current linux-2.6 state.
Thanks for this.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
version, with the following changes:
1. new
heya,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:38:38PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:36:32AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
snipp
- mm alternative msync() fix
this is beeing tested for lsb compliance,
once there is an ok for it, i
hi,
quick update on current linux-2.6 state.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
version, with the following changes:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
2. new Xen patch
3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, breaks
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
The first two ABI changes are specific to extra kernel flavors that
aren't relevant to the installer and have few (if any?) extra modules
built for them.
Actually, quite a few modules packages are being built for the
vserver
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-21 03:01]:
If the kernel team has decided to push forward with the ABI changes
(I don't know if this is the case, I haven't seen much response to
my message on-list?), it would certainly be better to get started on
this sooner rather than later.
On Thursday 21 December 2006 12:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, TTBOMK these packages could be binNMUed for a *silent* ABI change.
For an ABI change expressed in the package name, they would all need
sourceful uploads.
For d-i release management I'd actually prefer an ABI change for loop-aes
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
[...]
The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes.
Is there a new schedule already?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch
It's on my TODO list for this weekend.
This patch gets us back to the Relocation overflow problem, which was
also
Hi Frederik,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
version, with the following changes:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
2. new Xen patch
3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, breaks ABI
4. arm
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:32:54PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Frederik Schueler wrote:
If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot=20
wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
discuss them.
The 2.6.18.6 stable series
Hi Sven,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:36PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Why is loop-aes not part of the official module packages ?
Mostly because we have not yet found the time to complete the
integration. Note that the package uses linux-support-$KVERS, so
it is already easy to rebuild for ABI
Hi all,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might
be adaptable, the PAE migration of i386 Xen is not. But we need this
change as
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
Hi all,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might
be adaptable,
Hi,
On Saturday 16 December 2006 15:04, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
which version of the patch is it? 2.0.2.2-rc6 and 2.0.2.2-rc9 has
a critical bug which causes kernel oops if there is other traffic
while restarting vservers.
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch
It's on my TODO list for this weekend.
This patch gets us back to the Relocation overflow problem, which was
also reported by James
Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
version, with the following changes:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
2. new Xen patch
3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, breaks ABI
4. arm changes
5. 2.6.18.5 ABI breaking patch (Honour source
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Frederik Schueler wrote:
If you have any last minute changes which are that important they
cannot wait for the first point release kernel, please list them
here so we can discuss them.
You may want to apply this patch. This problem was reported before
on
Hi,
On Friday 15 December 2006 18:08, Frederik Schueler wrote:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
which version of the patch is it? 2.0.2.2-rc6 and 2.0.2.2-rc9 has a critical
bug which causes kernel oops if there is other traffic while restarting
vservers.
regards,
Holger
* Holger Levsen wrote:
On Friday 15 December 2006 18:08, Frederik Schueler wrote:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
which version of the patch is it? 2.0.2.2-rc6 and 2.0.2.2-rc9 has
a critical bug which causes kernel oops if there is other traffic
while restarting vservers.
* Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-15 18:08]:
The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes.
I'd prefer Wednesday because I'll only return from the Debian QA
meeting in Spain on Monday night and I need some time for tests on ARM
after backing out the msync
Hello,
I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
version, with the following changes:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
2. new Xen patch
3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, breaks ABI
4. arm changes
5. 2.6.18.5 ABI breaking patch (Honour source routing for LVS-NAT)
This
On Friday 15 December 2006 18:08, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Question towards the boot and release teams: is this OK with you? I
know this means a further delay of etch because of another round of
udebs and various changes in the installer configs, but the Xen issue
is odd and really needs a
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot
wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
discuss them.
- 2.6.16.X backports that are missing in 2.6.18.
- latest
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:19:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot
wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
discuss
Frederik Schueler wrote:
If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot=20
wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
discuss them.
The 2.6.18.6 stable series patches posted by Chris include some fixes
we should include:
- fixes data
26 matches
Mail list logo
