Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:14 +0200 > maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > [...] > > > > > > I'm having serious trouble parsing what you're trying to say here. > > > Could you re

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-10 Thread Frans Pop
Any reason debian-boot was dropped from CCs? Andres Salomon wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:14 +0200 > Not to mention OLPC support; it would be *really* nice to be able to > use d-i to install Debian onto an XO. Of course, other things > (grub-under-OFW or just plain OFW support, jffs2 formatti

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-10 Thread Andres Salomon
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:14 +0200 maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: [...] > > > > I'm having serious trouble parsing what you're trying to say here. > > Could you rephrase? > > you never checked the rh kernel. they do a *lot

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-09 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:14 +0200 maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > When a new stable *is* uploaded, D-I should be able to switch > > faster too (at least, if there's someone willing to do the initial > > kernel-wedge work) as the main criterium for D-I to switch to a new > > k

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 07 July 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > > > There are valid arguments to be found for staying with 2.6.25 a bit > > > longer, but "D-I has not yet converted to it" is NOT one of them. > > > > testing users are currently on an u

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 07 July 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > > There are valid arguments to be found for staying with 2.6.25 a bit > > longer, but "D-I has not yet converted to it" is NOT one of them. > > testing users are currently on an unsupported kernel. Eh, how does that follow my last para which I ass

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-07 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-07 17:30]: > In fact, having 2.6.25 in testing would possibly make it easier for > the kernel team to do a final (?) 2.6.25 upload with latest stable > updates. FWIW, I fully agree. In the past, we never waited for all arches in d-i to move to a new kernel

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:30:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > (adding d-kernel and d-release) > > On Monday 07 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > >> > please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6

Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

2008-07-07 Thread Frans Pop
(adding d-kernel and d-release) On Monday 07 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> > please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2, > >> > linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5 > >> > >> Please wai