Re: compression options

2011-12-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 05:54:10PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Next plan would be to use xz for the main image packages also. It > reduces the size of the packages by 30% or so. It cost only little cpu, > however the memory consumption raises. No objections? Then I'll do the change for all archi

Re: compression options

2011-10-28 Thread Rtp
Bastian Blank writes: > Hi Hi, > > Yesterday I changed the debug packages to use xz for compression. This > reduces the size of the package from 450 to 250MiB. > > Next plan would be to use xz for the main image packages also. It > reduces the size of the packages by 30% or so. It cost only litt

compression options

2011-10-28 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi Yesterday I changed the debug packages to use xz for compression. This reduces the size of the package from 450 to 250MiB. Next plan would be to use xz for the main image packages also. It reduces the size of the packages by 30% or so. It cost only little cpu, however the memory consumption ra