On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 12:26:52PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
a) less maintaince overhead for the security team
I don't think this is the case; but like you said, lets hear from them before
making this conclusion.
b) kernel-patch packages always work cross-plattform
define work :) By
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 07:52:15AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I believe its a greater maintenance mess to attempt to keep them united.
I can be more confident that upstream's ia64 arch patch will apply
reasonably
well to
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First time I see this wiki page. Comments:
new naming scheme getting rid of image as part or package names (only
for Provides: - compatibility issues), instead, distinguishing between
linux and hurd. First idea:
linux-kernel-source-KVERS
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[snip]
linux-kernel-KVERS-ARCH(-SUBVERS) (plus extras, see below)
remov the -kernel, linux is the kernel, and upstream tarballs are
linux-$version, too.
remove the -arch, it'll be .$arch.deb anyway, rather add a -flavour.
What do you name
First time I see this wiki page. Comments:
new naming scheme getting rid of image as part or package names (only
for Provides: - compatibility issues), instead, distinguishing between
linux and hurd. First idea:
linux-kernel-source-KVERS
linux-kernel-KVERS-ARCH(-SUBVERS) (plus
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 07:52:15AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
* architecture support patches hard to apply unless the main
kernel-source
package is pristine
as mentioned a few times architecture packages should be part of the
main kernel-source to avoid a big maintaince mess
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:14:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
linux-kernel-KVERS-ARCH(-SUBVERS) (plus extras, see below)
remov the -kernel, linux is the kernel, and upstream tarballs are
linux-$version, too.
remove the -arch, it'll be .$arch.deb anyway, rather add a -flavour.
This
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040602 17:55]:
From my conversations with Joey, the problem with today's scheme is that they
can't
just patch one source tree do rebuilds, since everyone is on different
kernel revisions
and some (ia64 in woody, for example), don't even use a
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:45:27PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
So when was the last s390-specific exploit you heard of? Or any
architecture-specific exploit?
Hmm, the ptrace exploit was only applicable on archs which uses
9 matches
Mail list logo
