On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:05:10PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 08:05:22AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I hope that this arrangements is acceptable by everyone while still
> > > helping at least users who are mostly interested in the code that Debian
> > > does di
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 08:05:22AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I hope that this arrangements is acceptable by everyone while still
> > helping at least users who are mostly interested in the code that Debian
> > does distributes. Hopefully these are most of the users.
>
> What is the real pro
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:43:46AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Do you mean that distributing the diffs with lines like
>
> -# a line that it was decided not to distribute
> -# another line that shouldn't be distributed
> -# yet another one
>
> is similar to distributing lines that it was decid
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> Talk to the firmware-removal zealots.
Talk to whoever went and just shuffled the tg3 related code in
prune-non-free around instead of activating it properly. Because just
like in 2.6.7, readd-tg3.dpatch is the only firmware related patch
that fails against vanill
Hi,
Shaul Karl writes:
> The description of kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8 claims that they should
> be applied to a pristine linux 2.6.8 kernel. Yet I get:
>
> No version.Debian file, assuming pristine Linux 2.6.8
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:43:46AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:16:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:13:08AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:02:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 0
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:16:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:13:08AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:02:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:17:11PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> > > > The description of kern
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:02:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:17:11PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> > The description of kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8 claims that they should
> > be applied to a pristine linux 2.6.8 kernel. Yet I get:
>
> That statement is wrong. We'l
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:13:08AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:02:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:17:11PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> > > The description of kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8 claims that they should
> > > be applied to a pristin
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:17:11PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> The description of kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8 claims that they should
> be applied to a pristine linux 2.6.8 kernel. Yet I get:
That statement is wrong. We'll have to fix it.
The description of kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8 claims that they should
be applied to a pristine linux 2.6.8 kernel. Yet I get:
No version.Debian file, assuming pristine Linux 2.6.8
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
2 out of 2 hunks i
11 matches
Mail list logo
