* Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-22 19:44]:
> > arm
> > Still not updated.
>
> I don't think there are any arm people hanging out on debian-kernel
> either. If you work out how to contact them, please let us know.
Vince has uploaded new images (built against kernel source -8) today.
I'm cu
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 09:00:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> After 1.5 months of mails, I guess this will be the last such mail sent
> to the kernel team. However, I understand that some new security hole
> may need yet another kernel ABI change. If that's true, the sooner we
> find out about that
After 1.5 months of mails, I guess this will be the last such mail sent
to the kernel team. However, I understand that some new security hole
may need yet another kernel ABI change. If that's true, the sooner we
find out about that the better, though judging from experience, updating
to a -3 abi wi
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > hppa
> > 2.4 now updated, but we dropped it.
>
> > 2.6 has abiname; still not updated, update is in kernel team svn.
>
> > [This is likely to block d-i rc3 until the new hppa 2.6 kernels
> > with the new abiname are available.]
>
> Updated 2.6.8 in sid,
* Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:05:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > alpha
> > Kernel updated, but not yet in testing; udebs not yet
> > updated (I thought they were before, but was wrong).
>
> Kernel is in testing, udebs are updated;; but the alpha debs need
> another
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:05:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
> > least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
> > module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
> > "
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:36:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:05:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > powerpc
> > No abiname. 2.4 not updated. 2.6 updated, debs in testing;
> > udebs updated.
> >
> > [If powerpc 2.4 is not updated with the security fixes soon,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 04:05:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> powerpc
> No abiname. 2.4 not updated. 2.6 updated, debs in testing;
> udebs updated.
>
> [If powerpc 2.4 is not updated with the security fixes soon, I
> will probably not let it block a d-i rc3 release.]
Oh we
* Joey Hess wrote:
> Update again, it's now been about 1 month since my first mail.
>
> alpha
> Kernel updated, but not yet in testing; udebs not yet
> updated (I thought they were before, but was wrong).
Steve uploaded an updated linux-kernel-di-alpha package today.
Norbert
--
T
Joey Hess wrote:
> Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
> least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
> module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
> "abiname". Here's my understanding of the current status of that:
Upd
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> powerpc
> No abiname. 2.4 not updated. 2.6 updated, debs in testing;
> udebs updated.
>
> [If powerpc 2.4 is not updated with the security fixes soon, I
> will probably not let it block a d-i rc3 release.]
Ah, we
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:46:39PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:41:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:2
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:11:14PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > I have no idea about the abichanges, m68k uses no abiname? Is that a
> > > problem?
> > The downside of not includeing an abiname in the package name is that
> > past d-i releases will break once the updated kernels and
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:58:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make
> > it
> > urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old
> > For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released be
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:25:47PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail:
> >
> > m68k
> > No abiname; not updated. ?
> >
> > [This is another arch that I'd consider
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
[snip]
> I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make it
> urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old
> For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released before I
> build new images. This is supposed to happen today/tomor
Horms wrote:
[snip]
> I have made both kernel-source-2.4.27 and kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 up on
> http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/ for people to take a look at.
Builds fine for mips, images soon available at
http://people.debian.org/~ths/mips-kernels/kernel-patch-2.4.27-mips/
Thiemo
--
To U
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make it
> urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old
> For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released before I
> build new images. This is supposed to happen today/tomorrow? I
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail:
>
> m68k
> No abiname; not updated. ?
>
> [This is another arch that I'd consider releasing d-i rc3 without
> it being updated for the kernel security fixes.]
Joey Hess wrote:
> Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
> least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
> module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
> "abiname". Here's my understanding of the current status of that:
Upd
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:41:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]:
> > > > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]:
> > > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) are
> >
> > mips and mipsel have been updated.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
> least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
> module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
> "abiname". Here's my underst
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]:
> > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) are
>
> mips and mipsel have been updated. However, given the new local root
> exploit (fixed in SVN), we'
* Joey Hess wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago.
>
> Do you or maybe vorlon plan to rebuild linux-kernel-di-alpha with
> them?
I'll update the package tomorrow.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Steve Langasek wrote:
> For 2.4, this requires i2c, kernel-latest-2.4-i386, linux-wlan-ng,
> lm-sensors, and oprofile-source to be ready to go at the same time with
> packages built against the new ABI. Of these, oprofile-source has had a
> recent upload, but has only out-of-date modules (none bui
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago.
Do you or maybe vorlon plan to rebuild linux-kernel-di-alpha with them?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Joey Hess wrote:
> As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that)
> are updated.
Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
> least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
> module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
> "abiname". Here's my underst
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]:
> As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) are
mips and mipsel have been updated. However, given the new local root
exploit (fixed in SVN), we'll all need to make another round of
updates anyway.
--
Martin Michlmayr
h
Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
"abiname". Here's my understanding of the current status of that:
i386
2.4 and 2.6 upd
31 matches
Mail list logo
