Your message dated Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:41:28 +0100
with message-id <20090325114128.ga5...@stro.at>
and subject line drivers containing firmware blobs
has caused the Debian Bug report #242866,
regarding linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2008 15:26:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: done mission over
has caused the Debian Bug report #242866,
regarding linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Thu, 15 May 2008 16:44:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: drivers containing firmware blobs
has caused the Debian Bug report #242866,
regarding linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware
to be marked as done.
This
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:46:56PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Maks -
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >> > > Something about [bug #242866] seems bro
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Maks -
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>> > > Something about [bug #242866] seems broken, however,
>> > > because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into
>>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:28:26PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:40:41 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > i will repeat as long as it takes.
>
> You are certainly free to do so. And experience (the hard way, rather
> than just by being told) the consequences of such behaviou
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:40:41 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> i will repeat as long as it takes.
You are certainly free to do so. And experience (the hard way, rather
than just by being told) the consequences of such behaviour.
> With some people there is no other way around, see how long and how
> m
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:23:43AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think the project need anymore such vulgarities, please try to stay
> I do not think the project needs anymore people with no concern for the
> needs of our users either.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:29:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:35:49 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> > /me still doesn't understand why you chose not to credit me though,
>
> You may not ever understand it. Repeating does not help.
I am also slightly (or more) offended by i
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:35:49 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> It was just some way to say, please don't be so harsh on larry, who
> has good intentions and actually did some work, not compared to
> others.
Sure. And that's great. If only you did not clutter such good intention
with whining.
Yes, it no
On Aug 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the project need anymore such vulgarities, please try to stay
I do not think the project needs anymore people with no concern for the
needs of our users either.
> polite, reread the social contract, and abide by what you agreed to
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:12:50AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >For each offending file, there are three possible solutions:
> >1. Get the author to release source code under a DFSG-free license
> >2. Move the firmware to non-free, patching the driver to use
> > req
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>For each offending file, there are three possible solutions:
>1. Get the author to release source code under a DFSG-free license
>2. Move the firmware to non-free, patching the driver to use
> request_firmware()
>3. Delete the driver and firmware entirely.
4. Recognize
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:10:40AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:54:09 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:43:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am dubious though that the
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:10:40AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:54:09 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:43:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am dubious though that the
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:21:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:07:09 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:04:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:09:12 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:50
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:54:09 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:43:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > I am dubious though that the wiki page can easily be modified to
> > > look as nicely as the page larry pro
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> I am dubious though that the wiki page can easily be modified to look
> as nicely as the page larry provided, but then i am no wiki expert,
> so i will let others comment who are more wiki experts (jonas
> maybe ?).
Beautification of wiki do
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:43:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am dubious though that the wiki page can easily be modified to look
> > as nicely as the page larry provided, but then i am no wiki expert,
> > so i will let others com
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:07:09 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:04:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:09:12 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:50:33PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:00:18 +020
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:04:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:09:12 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:50:33PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:00:18 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > Erm, some guys tried to kick
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:09:12 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:50:33PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:00:18 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > Erm, some guys tried to kick me out of debian for showing
> > > unpoliteness, so please moderate your langu
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:58:12PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:06:44PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers,
> > > that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front.
> >
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:06:44PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers,
> > that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front.
>
> I repeat my offer to patch any (well, almost any) of these
> drivers to use
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:50:33PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:00:18 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Erm, some guys tried to kick me out of debian for showing
> > unpoliteness, so please moderate your language here.
>
> ...and repeating over and over and over and over,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:19:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:06:44PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers,
> > that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front.
>
> I repeat my offer to patch any (w
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:00:18 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> Erm, some guys tried to kick me out of debian for showing
> unpoliteness, so please moderate your language here.
...and repeating over and over and over and over, like here!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:06:44PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers,
> that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front.
I repeat my offer to patch any (well, almost any) of these
drivers to use request_firmware(). I need a volunt
keep me out of this thread.
enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers,
that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front.
the drivers are free not-fucking non-free.
rest in peace
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Kyle -
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:41:52PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> No wonder you're so *** enthusiastic about removing support for
> hardware. You don't own any of it. How *** convenient.
Can I deduce from this that _you_ own some of the affected hardware?
If I patch in request_firmw
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:41:52PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> [Reply-To set to the list, I really don't want this idiocy in my
> personal Inbox.]
Kyle, this idiocy as you say it, is grounded in what we all claim and agreed
to in the social contract, which is a binding document to all DDs. You
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maks -
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > Something about [bug #242866] seems broken, however,
> > > because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into
> > > testing. Is it obvious
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:57:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> your thrown away grepping is the bad start.
Maks, please don't pick up a fight with larry so quickly, this is something
that you know was coming, which all the
[Reply-To set to the list, I really don't want this idiocy in my
personal Inbox.]
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If the kernel team decides on (2) or (3), I'd be happy to
> help with the coding. (Note that, due to the unfortunate
> state of upstream, most of
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:07:42AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> For each offending file, there are three possible solutions:
> 1. Get the author to release source code under a DFSG-free license
>
yes that is some work so commit yourself.
the rest is not the intent of the DFSG.
--
maks
Maks -
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Something about [bug #242866] seems broken, however,
> > because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into
> > testing. Is it obvious how to keep this from happening,
> > without starting a new bug attached to lin
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:57:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm aware of #242866, and I'd be happy to work within
> that report. Something about it seems broken, however,
> because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into
> testing. Is it obvious how to keep this from happening
Maks -
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:48:15AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:17:34PM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 2.1
>
> how about if you check for duplicate bug reports!
> see #242866 for
Your message dated Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:11:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free
binary firmware
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
The following 59 files, found in Debian's linux-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz,
apparently contain software in binary form, for which Debian has no
corresponding source code. Debian policy states that "The program
must include source code, a
40 matches
Mail list logo
