On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:58:05AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Some changes for trunk:
- Remove duplicated files in debian/arch.
Bastian
--
It would seem that evil retreats when forcibly confronted.
-- Yarnek of Excalbia, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.5
signature.asc
De
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
- sparc headers packages lacks sparc64 headers, who is responsible for
sparc?
That should be fixed by the commit 6370. I'm running the test build now.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:28:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
I just detected, that the modules support lacks some things.
> I intend to do the following changes:
- The modules source packages needs to build depend on linux-support-*
as they sometimes uses makefiles from there.
- The modules g
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:22:12PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> AFAICT, the linux-support package does not contain any arch-dependent
> files. Is there a good reason why it is 'Architecture: any', and not
> 'all'?
Read the commit logs. It is fixed in trunk and won't be backported to
sid.
Bastia
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
* linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all
Depend against linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all-$arch.
* linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all-$arch
Depends against any real headers packages.
* linux-support-$version-$abiname
Only needed to bootstrap modules pa
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 09:46:05AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Ok, I'm pretty lost here. If there are no headers now in
> linux-headers-$version (despite the name), where will the working headers
> now come from? Please describe it in detail, so that at least I can
> document it in kernel-handb
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 09:44:15AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> My question is why are you
> cross-compiling at all (and which arch).
i386, s390 and m68k.
> cross-compiling at all (and which arch). Of course, it is nice to be able
> to help slow arc
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
No. linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all-$arch are empty[tm] packages
which depends on any headers packages for the given architecture.
linux-headers-$version don't contain any header, it is only a container
for a verbatim copy of debian/{arch,lib,modules}
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
The whole linux-kbuild stuff only provides any gain if it is build
seperately. This way this package is built natively for the target
architecture.
Bastian
I still don't see a clear reason why this is required. I see that if you
are cross-compiling, t
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 05:27:53PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:28:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > - Rename linux-headers-$version to linux-support-$version.
> > linux-headers-$version was planned as dependency package and container
> > for the files necessary to
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:54:34AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:44:50AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:28:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > I intend to do the following changes:
> > > - Rename linux-headers-$version to linux-support-$
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:28:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I intend to do the following changes:
> - Rename linux-headers-$version to linux-support-$version.
> linux-headers-$version was planned as dependency package and container
> for the files necessary to bootstrap modul
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:44:50AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:28:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I intend to do the following changes:
> > - Rename linux-headers-$version to linux-support-$version.
> stupid question: Why not merge the redone linux-kbuild-2.6 i
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:28:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I intend to do the following changes:
> - Rename linux-headers-$version to linux-support-$version.
stupid question: Why not merge the redone linux-kbuild-2.6 into
this package?
> - Change abiname in trunk.
Good idea.
In
Hi folks
I intend to do the following changes:
- Rename linux-headers-$version to linux-support-$version.
linux-headers-$version was planned as dependency package and container
for the files necessary to bootstrap modules packages.
It is not longer a dependency package as build-dependencies
15 matches
Mail list logo
