On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:42:25PM -0400, David Worthen wrote:
> Thanks for the info Ben. Can you re-send the original message? I didn't
> save the recommended texts of the licenses.
Hi David
Ben didn't mention this, but if you could release the source code instead,
it would be most appreciated.
David Worthen wrote:
> Thanks for the info Ben. Can you re-send the original message? I didn't
> save the recommended texts of the licenses.
The message is available here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/10/msg00447.html
Best regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: WhiteHEAT driver and firmware distribution for Linux
On Fri, Mar 21, 2031 at 04:17:18AM -0400, David Worthen wrote:
Hi Ben,
We would be most pleased to clarify license as suggested below. Where do
you suggest we pla
On Fri, Mar 21, 2031 at 04:17:18AM -0400, David Worthen wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> We would be most pleased to clarify license as suggested below. Where do
> you suggest we place the text captioned below?
> Regards, david
Your chosen licence text should appear at the top of whiteheat_fw.h in
place of the
gt;
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:40 PM
Subject: WhiteHEAT driver and firmware distribution for Linux
I am writing as a member of the Debian project, which distributes a
version of Linux. The project is attempting to resolve the licencing of
firmware used with Linux. The following may req
I am writing as a member of the Debian project, which distributes a
version of Linux. The project is attempting to resolve the licencing of
firmware used with Linux. The following may require attention by your
legal department.
Linux includes a driver and firmware for WhiteHEAT which are listed
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-9
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The file drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat_fw.h contains machine code
written as C structures/arrays, for which the source code is not
provided. Further, the licence for the firmware is stated to be GPLv2
which does not
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:18:18AM +0200, Hans K?hler wrote:
> Just want to ask if there is a special reason why usb-serial module
> "whiteheat" is not compiled
> in the kernel-image .deb file? I'm missing it since 2.6.16 (I think).
What package (i.e., what architecture)
Just want to ask if there is a special reason why usb-serial module
"whiteheat" is not compiled in the kernel-image .deb file? I'm missing
it since 2.6.16 (I think).
kind regards
hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
9 matches
Mail list logo
