On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:42:20PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:47:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
We need to decide which arches needs this rewrite now and which value
should be filed in.
And also, how should we re-write them? Should we just provide
.org.zseries.debian00:storage.org.zseries.debian04v4-lun-1.
More than one path needs multipath-tools also.
The following devices can be ignored:
- md*
- mapper/*
- lvm symlinks
Or should we ignore all devices which we don't know about?
I would think so.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
be released now as far as I'm concerned.
I'm testing building a fix for #431773 right now that I'd like to get
into -3.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
Since I don't see this change in Linus' latest tree, I suggest
submitting it upstream first. Once this change (or something like it)
is included, please update this bug report with a pointer to the
changeset.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/sky2-updates.patch
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
don't have the hardware in question, so all I've been able to test
is that it builds cleanly. Can you test these for us or help us find
some users who can? I'd like to get positive feedback on both the
SB600 and SB700 before releasing. Please direct that feedback to this
bug report.
--
dann frazier
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 07:05:52PM +0200, Kajetan Hinner wrote:
dann frazier schrieb:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:15:07AM +0200, Kajetan Hinner wrote:
But in the case of our server all seemed to run fine for months but
since three weeks or so every now and then all network traffic stops
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=462b529f91b618f4bd144bbc6184f616dfb58a1e
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, then swap the disks.
It is possible to build your own installer w/ a custom kernel, but its
not a path I would suggest if the disk-swap procedure is workable.
Because I think etch(4.0) can NOT be installed onto SB700 board
directly.
That's how I understand it as well.
--
dann frazier
.
Please let us know how that goes.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
such as 2.6.18.dfsg.1-14~snapshot.9168? Please tell us if you
know.
Yes, there is a package called linux-source-2.6.18 that installs a
source tarball in /usr/src. Snapshots of this are autobuilt along with
the rest, so it should appear in the next 24 hours as well.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
or not in the future.
Ok - let me know what you find out. (ODD == Optical Disk Drive?)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]' and using the following as the first few
lines of the body:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system information, checking
to see if the bug was fixed in a more recent release, and reporting
issues upstream.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:30:50AM +0300, Jari Jylh?? wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686-bigmem
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch1
Severity: important
Mothetboard is Asus P5P.
Does this happen with 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13? Does it happen with
2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2?
--
dann frazier
://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-2.6.18-5-686_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch1_i386.deb -- Works
Thanks Jari,
Can you also test:
linux-image-2.6.18-5-686-bigmem_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13_i386.deb
linux-image-2.6.18-5-686_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13_i386.deb
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
I miss a discussion somewhere?
otavio will take care of the d-i side of the thing.s
yeah, this is a topic for the next d-i meeting
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2007-08-18, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the
version 6, anything
/DebianKernelReportingBugs
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:10:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Are security updates visible at this point in the install. I think
they are (except for network-less installs).
No.
Bummer, but at least it fixes upgrades
vs. non-PAE on systems with =
4G?
[1] At least, there's a note in Kconfig that says:
'NOTE: If you say 64GB here, then the kernel will not boot on
CPUs that don't support PAE!'
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
, please try 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13 and see if it works.
If the latest kernel is still not working, please provide the dmesg
output of the last working kernel.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
maks, looks like you disabled them. comments?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? Or are snapshots just offline atm?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
For example:
Dropping 686-bigmem
---
- 686-bigmem dies
- 686 flavour acquires PAE support
- Users with currently installed -686 systems somehow upgrade to the
486 flavour
Dropping k7
---
...
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:10:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:10:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Are security updates visible at this point in the install. I think
they are (except for network-less
disk space.
fwiw, a coworker is looking into the availability of a benchmark that
should be good for comparing pae/non-pae.
[1] whatever that means.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
explanation about why the bug is = important severity and why the fix
is unlikely to cause regressions.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:07:32AM +, Frederik Sch??ler wrote:
Author: fs
Date: Thu Aug 23 10:07:32 2007
New Revision: 9352
Log:
Add support for 3ware 9650SE controllers.
Where's the bug report for this, and how do you know it doesn't
regress anything with other controllers?
--
dann
patch into etch at this
point would be w/ etch 1/2, though I've no clue if upstream Xen is at
all caught up w/ recent 2.6.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13
Severity: important
Brian Haley reported that our backported fix for CVE-2007-2242 breaks
ipv6 rfc conformance. He sent me the attached patch to fix it.
--
dann frazier
diff --git a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
index 95a9eb5..6e9822d
my system to fail to boot because I am booting off an IDE disk.
Yes, many ia64 config options got dropped due to a config cleanup, and
I couldn't fix it until we had an ABI-changing upload.
Such an upload just occurred, so this should be resolved in 2.6.22-4.
--
dann frazier
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:37:13PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:40:59AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Dropping 686-bigmem
---
- 686-bigmem dies
- 686 flavour acquires PAE support
Please reread what I wrote: Rename 686-bigmem to 686-pae.
No need
severity 404815 important
thanks
As this bug has security implications (I've requested a CVE
ID for it), I'm bumping the severity.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:11:42AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 07:44:59PM +0300, Jari Jylh?? wrote:
linux-image-2.6.18-4-686-bigmem_2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2_i386.deb -- Works
linux-image-2.6.18-5-686-bigmem_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch1_i386.deb --
Freezes on boot
linux
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:11:25AM +0300, Jari Jylh?? wrote:
dann frazier kirjoitti:
Would you mind testing this one?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/438458/linux-image-2.6.18-5-686-bigmem_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2+agptest1_i386.deb
It freezes too just like others.
Well, thanks
, there's no way this kernel will work for you.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:46:10AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:39:06AM +0300, Henrik Wall??n wrote:
I forgot to point out that I use the amd64 arch, not i386. Maybe this
mismatch is the problem this time? (I used --force-architecture to be
able to install the above
fix for the intel_agp regression in #438458. After the
merge of the last security upload, this has been the biggest blocker
imo since it fixes a regression introduced in r1.
linux-2.6 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-14) UNRELEASED; urgency=high
[ dann frazier ]
* [bluetooth] Fix panic caused by race between
be updated.
linux-image-2.6.18-5 doesn't call update-grub directly - rather it
relies on hooks defined in /etc/kernel-img.conf. Are those hooks
missing? Are those hooks there and failing to run? Have you modified
your menu.lst file such that update-grub is unable to insert new
definitions?
--
dann
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
hey,
I think we're nearly ready for a kernel upload to proposed-updates.
Here's the current list of changes queued for a stable upload.
Can you please consider fixing #317258 again? It's only about PCI ID
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:12:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:53:50AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Have you verified that this fix works in 2.6.18? It seems like its
adding support for megaraid3s w/ specific subsystem devices, while
2.6.18 (and current upstream
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
hey,
I think we're nearly ready for a kernel upload to proposed-updates.
Here's the current list of changes queued for a stable upload.
Can you please consider fixing #317258 again? It's only about PCI ID
queue-2.6.24/ | wc -l
65
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
proposed (moving the lazy_mmu_prot_update
call) is believed to sufficiently resolve the issue. This fix, along
with a similar fix for migrate.c, was picked up by the RHEL kernels
(attached). I suggest including this fix in stable.
--
dann frazier
From: Luming Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RHEL
fyi, this change is pending in the stable queue for 2.6.24.4, so will
likley be included in 2.6.24-5
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
aba dannf: I *assume* we'll have a testing migration soon, so please
delay sid uploads until that happened ...
I don't know if the RC-bug reduction changes that at all (specifically
#469058, and the arguably RC #463669).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:43:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:50:42PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
* gdth unfixed
fixed with upcoming 2.6.24.4
* CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES vs. atd
Anyone object
, but there are additional
fixes on top of that.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. An it8213 driver was introduced just after 2.6.20, compiles
cleanly against 2.6.18-18, and works fine in my tests.
RF
[0] Well, in my case we install onto 3ware controllers, so it's
installable if I grab a USB cdrom drive.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
this as a kernel bug, then the only way we could fix it
is to update the kernel. Luckily we updated to 2.6 long ago, so we're
good.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:04:54PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:14:12PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Does anyone see a problem w/ enabling the ide-scsi module for etch,
sid, trunk, etc?
Yes. Two modules claiming the same devices is a bad idea.
I would agree if both
the
first, but its worth a try..
That aside, I wonder if there's any good reasons to not take the split
out patch, allowing these cards to function if the user chooses to
manually install this firmware image.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
I created an etch branch for linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.24, did a build
(renamed orig.tar.gz) and tested a module build - seems fine to
me. If noone sees the need for further changes, I'll upload tomorrow.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
to redistribute :(
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
before modifying
it, but I chose to minimize differences to simplify merging. Do you
have a preferred way of handling this?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(This time w/ the attachment)
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 02:23:56PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I've created a branch of linux-latest for etchnhalf (r11072), but I
wanted to run it past some people before I upload.
Frans: Can you review the attached generated control file to verify
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:27:26AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008, dann frazier wrote:
Frans: Can you review the attached generated control file to verify
that it is what d-i expects?
Not quite. It should be linux-image-2.6-flavor-etchnhalf.
Thanks, how's this?
--
dann
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 09:02:16AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:27:26AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2008, dann frazier wrote:
Frans: Can you review the attached generated control file to verify
that it is what d-i expects?
Not quite. It should
probably not worth delaying the pending upload
(which maybe happenging today?) for this.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/02/msg00278.html
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the names under /dev/disk/by-* (/dev/disk/by-uuid) instead
of names like sda, sdb. Device enumeration isn't guaranteed to be
consistent across reboots.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this on Thursday unless there's a reason to
postpone.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:53:10AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:48:34AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:54:07AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
* Enable fw-split cs46xx (need to test patch in #464197 first)
Looks like I need to add a NACK
forward.
So, I'm looking for any specific known issues here - e.g., a driver
known-broken in 2.6.25 that works well in 2.6.24. There are likely
numerous cases of the inverse, but I don't know if its worth spelling
those out.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
as a security update, and we're not going to get the security
team to release a security update for a non-security issue.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
This patch will appear in packages with version
2.6.18.dfsg.1-21~snapshot.3 or greater.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:20:53PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
A fix for this was committed last night and should appear in an etch
snapshot build in the next few hours. If you are able to reproduce
this bug, please test a snapshot build and provide results back to
this report.
Information
free to add the info below)
Added to http://wiki.debian.org/EtchAndAHalf/ReleaseNotes :-)
Thanks Holger!
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be a candidate
for etch's 2.6.18.
Using mode 5 maybe a workaround for this issue, if it meets your
requirements.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This includes 2.6.24.6, and some backports that add ids for intel's
ICH10 southbridge.
I'll upload tomorrow, barring any objections.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26
# SRM team considers missing hardware support to be important
severity 479773 important
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:29:43AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
This includes 2.6.24.6, and some backports that add ids for intel's
ICH10 southbridge.
I'll upload tomorrow, barring any objections.
Oh yeah, and any reason to not drop linux-libc-dev in this upload?
--
dann frazier
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:03:47PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:20:53PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
A fix for this was committed last night and should appear in an etch
snapshot build in the next few hours. If you are able to reproduce
this bug, please test
know if any
other changes are necessary.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/05/msg00062.html
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:53:41AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:29:43AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
This includes 2.6.24.6, and some backports that add ids for intel's
ICH10 southbridge.
I'll upload tomorrow, barring any objections.
Oh yeah, and any reason
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:06:01AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:56:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Beta 2 of d-i will be using 2.6.24[1], the current version of which
is missing a couple of stable
since ages.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on
reboot.
Corruption fixes are definitely reasonable for stable updates, I'll
take a look at porting this. Thanks for tracking it down.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:32:52AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:29:33PM +0800, Steven Wilton wrote:
Hi,
I added a response to the following bug report about 6 months ago, and
was wondering if it can be resolved:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
.
I'd guess everyone appreciates your firsthand Xen knownledge and
the Xen push in Debian. it be natural to mark Ian as Xen Maintainer.
No objection here.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to do a 2.6.18 upload to p-u tomorrow to merge in the last
few security updates.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel...
Keep a kernel that you know works installed then.
Also one wants to only have packages installed that are in the
archive, according to apt-show-versions.
Sounds like a personal conflict for you, not Debian users in general.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
hey,
I just committed some updates I'd like to try and get in for
etch/etchnhalf in r11515. Let me know if I missed something. I haven't
tested the iwlwifi stuff yet, but bnx2 and the hook change for qlogic
both worked fine on my systems.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
hey Alex, TSUCHIYA,
Can you test this build to verify that it fixes the issue for you?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/482943/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by drivers in the etchnhalf kernel.
+ * Add initramfs hook support for bnx2
+ * Correct path to initramfs.conf file in postinst which was preventing
+initramfs updates for qlogic (and now bnx2) fw, closes: #432042
+
+ -- dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:33:43 -0600
talking to a few ia64 folks, I think its a good idea to switch
ia64 over to SPARSEMEM.
How should we handle this as this may have large speed impacts?
Bastian
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's a handful of security fixes pending, so I'd like to schedule
another upload of the etchnhalf kernel. I'll plan on uploading
tomorrow unless someone requests an extension.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
281248 286267 299043 305691
316539 316540
kernel-image-2.6.8-3-sparc64-smp: 270187 283783 288180 308557
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somewhere next week for some other work.
Well, since you asked :) Can you test the etchnhalf kernel? Latest one is:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.2_i386.deb
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
,
.ioctl = aac_ioctl,
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
-=- cut here -=-
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have trouble with
your suggestion - maybe you want to give him a call? :) Probably safer
to assume it was just an accidental typo.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:33:23AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:23:14PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 01:32:48PM +, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Modified: dists/trunk
create
rhel44-x86_32p-1 kernel=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-x86_32p-xenU ramdisk=
xm create rhel41-x86_32p-1 kernel=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-x86_32p-xenU
ramdisk= sleep 1m ; xm dest debian-1 ; xm dest debian-2 ; xm dest
rhel41-1 ; xm dest rhel44-1 ; sleep 5s ; n=$(($n + 1)) ; done
--
dann
hey,
We need a new upload to sync in security fixes before r4. I plan to
do an upload this evening unless someone has a strong reason for a
delay. thanks!
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the etchnhalf specific package to the
openafs-source (or whatever) in lenny - but there maybe reasons not to
do this. I believe Daniel was working on a plan for this at one point,
maybe he has a suggestion?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:11:25AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:48:45AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'm quite happy to upload new packages for etchnhalf, but I'm afraid
they'd have to be just that -- packages of a newer
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:47:38PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I understand this correctly, that would mean that etch users would
be forced to move to the new module code, right?. I don't doubt that
it would work just fine, but objective #1
.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
401 - 500 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo
