version 2.6.8-14,
wich contains all current security updates.
I'll notice you again as soon as my sponsor has done the upload.
I've just completed a sponsored upload of Frederik's changes.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:49 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:17:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:45 +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:57:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there are updates to unstable
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 05:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:36:58PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:49 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:17:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:45 +0200, Frederik
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 05:01 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:50:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
If you want to merge those changes into kernel-source-2.4.27
(obviously for a future, non-sarge r0 release) please
feel free to do so.
AIUI, he's saying that a fix he
As this is a FAQ, I've added some content from one of Horms' Debian
Kernel slides to the wiki:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
Maybe that'll make it easier to respond to such bug reports.
---BeginMessage---
reassign #303918 kernel
thanks
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Steve
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 23:47 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2005, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
I posted a draft of a paper for DebConf here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/debconf5/
cool
If you have time in the next couple of days, please take a look
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 14:28 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:06:42AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
I posted a draft of a paper for DebConf here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/debconf5/
I would like to see a section about joining the debian-kernel
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Hi,
I am surprised by the package description which says:
Note that these patches do NOT apply
against a pristine Linux 2.6.11 kernel but only against
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz from the Debian archive.
In fact,
is not yet
integrated upstream, and is therefore an unlikely candidate for
inclusion in an official kernel-source tree.
See http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines for
more information.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:37 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:14:45AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Hi,
I am surprised by the package description which says:
Note that these patches do NOT apply
against
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:06:42AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
I posted a draft of a paper for DebConf here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/debconf5/
If you have time in the next couple of days, please take a look and
tell
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 19:40 -0300, Rodrigo Colao Merlo wrote:
Package: kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-k7
Severity: normal
Thanks for the report Rodrigo.
The command make-kpkg modules_image do not generate modules to
specific -k7 kernel_image package.
What does it do instead?
An example is nvidia
that will be available in time to
meet our release schedule, without counting on this possible update
later.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(devfs removal, udev, initramfs transition,
linux-2.6 transition, etc).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a
decision. I'll point Adrian to this thread so that he can see that we
are looking at his work with some interest.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:18:29AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch?
Mips/mipsel d-i hasn't fully switched to 2.6 yet. Is there a urgent
need
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-16 17:04]:
I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch?
For mips/mipsel, there's at least one
, sorry for the crudeness of that wiki page; I had to leave
before I finished cleaning it up figured I'd just commit it first.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey,
Frans Pop assembled an informal BoF at DebConf to discuss cross-team
issues related to the kernel[1]. Attendees included:
Micah Anderson (micah)
Andreas Barth (aba)
dann frazier (dannf)
Joey Hess (joeyh)
Moritz Muehlenhoff (jmm)
Frans Pop (fjp)
Manoj Srivastava (manoj
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:46:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
Kernel udeb creation process (possibly using k-p?)
-
If we build all of the *existing* udebs from a single source, we
it unless someone steps up
to handle this. Of course, you could always request insecure status
from the release team (with proper release notes, etc).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:29:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 15:14]:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
need some further discussion among
?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
What is the status of the other architectures?
ia64 configs have been updated test builds are in progress
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
/netfilter|related/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ULOG.c
Marked for consideration for a sarge stable update.
I use Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r2 (with last updates),
kernel 2.6.8-2-686-smp.
That's not the latest, fwiw - make sure you have
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp installed.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
the 2.6.16 kernel from sid to see if the problem
goes away? I'm unaware of any patches in the Debian kernel that are
likely to change this behavior.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:29:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Is the plan to do a linux-2.6.16 upload at the same time, or does
this imply a decision to use = 2.6.17 in etch?
We have not yet decided about what
probably keep the
2.6.16 compiler hardcoded to whatever is the default in etch when we
upload (its still gcc-4.0 today, right)? This way we won't
unintentionally break module loading with updates to
stable/stable-security when rebuilding in a pristine etch environment.
--
dann frazier
useful
feedback.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in
linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop
and version string if you plan to distribute your
work, so that it is clearly diffentiated from ours when users file bug
reports.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
merged upstream in
2.6.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. But to reiterate, if
something in a kernel update causes the patch to no longer apply, I
would want to have a reliable contact (hopefully 2 people) whom we can
call upon for assistance.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
, and fjp just in case its
eventual propagation into etch would affect d-i? My current assumption
is that it isn't a problem unless we change the ABI.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and retrying
2.6.17-6. Please let us know how that works for you.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, drop to a shell and wget the drivers from
your server
* Use insmod/modprobe to load these modules
* return to the installer
If you have problems, like you don't have access to an http server,
etc, hop on #debian-ia64 i'll try to help you out.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
?
lspci -v
lspci -n
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Michael Henneton wrote:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
Michael,
Please resend in plain-text.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:41:09AM +0200, The Anarcat wrote:
Available for debugging/testing with right tools/instructions...
Can you try the 2.6.17 kernel from sid and see if it improves things?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
#342246: [ia64 headers] arch/ia64/modules.lds: No such file or
directory
This should be fixed by r7212
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
..)
The belief being that if users build their own kernel, then that build
tree is the desired place for the symlink to point.
I'm not sure what the best way is to make this automatically point to
the headers dir.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
would be eating all the memory, but this
might reduce it.
Then again, maybe nobse's fix worked out...
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:12:33PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
AGP_INTEL is on by default for x86_64 in the current 2.6 Linux kernels.
Closing then, thanks Nathanael.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383299
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in sid.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the install process but the installer hang when
installing the inird-tools :-(.
See #383557; this should also be fixed in the nightlies.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:00:11PM -0400, Germ?n Po? Caama?o wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 11:36 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 01:28:06PM -0400, Germ??n Po?? Caama??o wrote:
Anyway, it's running again. I was seeing the problem any time that I
tried to upgrade (write
we care to)? I assume that this is
the appropriate kernel for all existing/planned i386/EFI systems, but
that would mean d-i would need to use this flavor for the install
kernel.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
hey Erik,
Since beta3 d-i has moved to using a 2.6.17 kernel, can you give one
of the daily snapshots a test to see if this problem goes away?
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
etch to 2.6.17, so linux-2.6.16 will probably
not be updated much, if at all.
I suggest you move your system to 2.6.17.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NR_UARTS and RUNTIME_UARTS to 4.
* mipsel/r5k-cobalt: Fix MAC detection problem on Qube 2700.
- [ Kyle McMartin ]
- * Apply patch to fix pa8800 (mostly...)
-
hey Frederik,
Did you mean to remove Kyle's comment, or was that a typo?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
future, models of HP servers; any which use the iLO 2 chip: including all
of their new Blade
servers.
The plan is to either ship etch with 2.6.17 or 2.6.18 so this won't be
a problem.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
. Thanks in advance.
The packages without the -smp extension have SMP support starting in
2.6.17.
Closing..
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 06:32:01AM +, gmu 2k6 wrote:
what about CONFIG_*_PAE/bigmem support? as 2.6-686-bigmem is not available
in etch I'm confused whether -bigmem will be made available in etch.
This will be available in etch when 2.6.17 enters.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:40:01PM -0400, jef e wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
Dykema, Erik wrote:
Using the build for i386, I was able to install very cleanly, and
reboot, at which point the USB
messages started spewing again. By hitting ctrl-c a few times, I was able
to get
initrd.img-2.6.17-1-686
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /usr/share/doc | grep linux-image-2\.6\.16-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=8833ebaa3f4325820fe3338ccf6fae04f6669254
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would be to always
apply it so that the linux-source package is more complete.
Mind if I change that?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-by line to the maintainer of the ne driver. Once its
accepted, let us know give us an idea of why you think Debian should
include it.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
confirm whether or not you had previously mounted this
partition under a 2.6.17 kernel earlier than 2.6.17-1? You should be
able to check /var/log/dpkg.log* to see if you had installed one.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge4
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:55:51PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Any chance this is another incarnation of the now infamous ide-generic bug
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:52:08AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:38:30PM +, Dann Frazier wrote:
Log:
* drivers-ide-pci-via82cxxx-vt8237a-id.patch: Add missing PCI ID
for VT8237A chips, reported by Radek Oliwa.
The patch is untested[1] and I just reverted
.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006-07-16 11:27
kernelextras
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 426 2006-06-27 04:07 thermal
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 705 2006-08-27 04:38 udev
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
uses shell variable names for handling dependencies.
Notice that '-' is not a valid shell variable name and thus should not
be used as script filename.
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
documentation (I
learned about it in an old HOWTO on the web, but my links to it are no
longer valid). Please verify that this is indeed the problem and reply
to this bug report.
For now, I'll reassign to the grub package since the kernel package is
not responsible for these settings.
--
dann frazier
, but to pick the upstream default - this will hopefully help
in building those architectures, which haven't been updated yet.
[trimming recipient list]
fyi, ia64 builds and boots fine for me.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
help from HP people if we run into ia64-specific problems.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Please include next PCI Vender ID to r8169.c .
It is generally preferred that changes go upstream first.
Would you mind reporting this to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/?
If you do, please note the bug number in this report.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
reassign 389328 kernel-package
stop
I'm not sure if this should be considered a kernel-package bug for not
dealing with an interactive bootloader install or a lilo bug for going
interactive in the first place; reassigning to kernel-package as a
first guess.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
the 486 version.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge5
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 12:08:14PM +0200, Peter Kruse wrote:
Hello,
it looks like that the latest security update to the kernel fixes this
problem:
Thanks, closing therefore.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
solution to reboot. I try to disable HyperThreading in SETUP and
all systems returns to function,
so, something happens with this image and SMP option. The older
linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp is OK.
hey Cesar,
Can you reproduce with the 2.6.18 kernel in sid?
--
dann frazier
Julien.
The postinst comes from kernel-package so reassigning there.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Note that all bug fixes are happening with 2.6.18 as it is the kernel
most likely to ship with etch. I don't think there will be anymore
uploads of 2.6.17.
But, I can try if this to be worthwhile for the Debian team.
Its worthwhile to know if it is already fixed or not, yes.
--
dann frazier
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:03:29PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Hi,
Is a 2.6.12 (or more recent) smp kernel for i686 planned?
Thank you.
The latest kernel in sid is 2.6.18 and the 686 flavour has SMP
support.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:16:59PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:10:09PM +, Dann Frazier wrote:
+[Arch: alpha]
+Multiprocessor systems are no longer supported by the Linux kernel images
in
+Debian due to a lack of support upstream.
This is currently
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:11:53PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I've started a draft in kernel svn in people/dannf/etch-release-notes
- if the kernel team is cool with working together on this file, I'll
volunteer to sgmlify
) kernel.
So, I assume it is fixed in 2.6.18.
hey Dmitry,
This sounds like a *success* report, not a bug report ;)
Is this a follow up to another bug report? If so, which one?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
...
I suggest reporting a bug against linux-2.6 that includes the package
name and version in which this module no longer exists.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel), please follow-up with a pointer to the changeset and we
will certainly consider it for inclusion.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the etch release.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
configured. Is that correct? If so, you may want to remove it from
/etc/raidtab.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel-image-2.6-686
package.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for etch.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the kernel we currently
plan to ship in etch.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. :-(
The kernel team's goal is to ship etch with 2.6.18.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reasonable.
Can we get confirmation from the bug submitter that it actually fixes
the problem?
hey Dmitry,
Are you able to test this fix?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the entire boot log.
Bryan,
Thanks for the report; fyi, we plan to ship 2.6.18 in etch and are
no longer actively maintaining the 2.6.17 tree.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not go into stable.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that 2.6.18 is already ready for us to push in.
I would really like to see this as well; let me know if I can help by
updating lkdi packages, etc.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 2.6.16-1
If this was fixed in 2.6.16-rcX it should still be fixed, so closing.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does this bug still exist with the 2.6.18 kernel in sid?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey,
Can you reproduce this bug with the 2.6.18 kernel in sid?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sysrq_enabled =
0, or submit a bug to procps asking for /etc/sysctl.conf to disable it
by default.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Please provide names of such tools. (TIA)
udev - see /dev/by-id, etc.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
understand the distinction.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
informations are puzzling: in fact
corelli:~# uname -a
Linux corelli 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
_^
suggesting the kernel was built for a multiprocessor system
That's expected, the 686 flavour is SMP capable now.
--
dann
601 - 700 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo
