On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:14:06AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:23:23PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I'm looking at fixing #392592, and I'm wondering where
arch/$arch/scripts should go? ia64 has them (as does um).
On ia64, the usage can be patched away, no need
that
this is fixed?
Latest one is currently:
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.18-1-amd64_2.6.18-3~snapshot.7630_amd64.deb
And should be accessible with this sources.list entry:
deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel trunk main
--
dann
install fine on an etch system, and is the kernel we plan to
ship in etch.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 2.6.18-3
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:55:09PM +0930, Adrian Johnson wrote:
2.6.18-3 seems to be working fine.
Great, thanks for the feedback.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are saying this problem is due to
lack of termination, and is therefore not a kernel bug. I will go
ahead and close this bug accordingly. If I have misunderstood, feel
free to reopen.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 395181 initrd-tools
thanks
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:05:33PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
The package is missing a dependency on libdevmapper1.01
Thanks - the issue is most likely with initrd-tools, so reassigning.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Version: 2.6.18-1
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:15:41PM +0400, Sheplyakov Alexei wrote:
The patch I've mentioned went into 2.6.18 (according to ChangeLog-2.6.18),
so 2.6.18 should work. That said, I can't test 2.6.18 now :(
Great, thanks for debugging. I'll marked as fixed in 2.6.18-1.
--
dann
old lvm please.
hey Debian LVM Team,
Do you have a recommendation for such a conflict?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 12:13:46PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:14:06AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:23:23PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I'm looking at fixing #392592, and I'm wondering where
arch/$arch/scripts should go? ia64 has them
, its not something we can use to resolve this issue today.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, I think localized backports that help increase
hardware support (needed for installation or no) are good things.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:52:58PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Any url or other reference to it ?
http://packages.debian.org/systemconfigurator
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are a useful tool, there was
at some time an effort to create a system of kernel team usertags, but
AFAIK it never went anywhere (the page is probably still somewhere on
the wiki though).
Yep, here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelBTSUserTags
Feel free to add to it.
--
dann frazier
:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-develm=116230631107331w=2
But I do believe we have to wait for maintainer's position before proceding.
If I have any news about that I'll update this bug report
Thanks!
Thank you, tagging the bug appropriately.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
sure to e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not just
the bug report itself to make sure a message hits the filer.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the firmware, but older
versions needs that as well. The supplied patch reverses that behaviour.
Upstream was notified, but in the meanwhile it would be interesting to
provide this fix on debian.
Thanks Alexandre,
Do you have a poitner to where upstream was notified?
--
dann frazier
it:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/
It needs to get accepted upstream first:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
feature (as opposed to a regression).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
believe you can place override modules under:
/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/updates
and they will be preferred. You can also create custom search paths -
see depmod.conf(5) for details.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
this, but didn't see it in the bug
report. I see now that it was just that the bug report wasn't cc'd -
doing so now.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's a push for a stable update this weekend, so I'm currently
preparing an upload to p-u with the two changes we have queued (on top
of today's DSA for 2.6.18.dfsg.1-22etch3):
[ Ian Campbell ]
* Fix DMA crash under Xen when no IOMMU is present (closes: #445987)
[ dann frazier
, regards.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.x]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:04 04 96f34c51d3eb7e47f101f5cbfa15ae2a6f39480f
900bf1fe7100529521a97c56440185686ce7453d M fs
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
could help me, i could send you more info.
David,
We will have to have more info to be able to diagnose this issue. If
you have a second computer, you could try using a serial console to
capture the panic. A link to a photo of the screen can also work.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
mount.
Maybe depends on newer yaird/initramfs-tools?
Please provide the output of the install so we can understand what
happened.
Are you using yaird or initramfs-tools?
If yaird, please try pulling the version from proposed-updates, which
will be included in an etch update this weekend.
--
dann
is suggested that retrieves the queue depth setting
from the card's config instead of hard coding each card's value in a
table.
2.6.18 can also use 9cff3b383dad193b0762c27278a16237e10b53dc, adding
pci ids for the previously released P700M controller, which is already
supported in 2.6.24.
--
dann frazier
-tools, if questions, contact me.
Right - please try updated yaird in stable-proposed-updates.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:50:12PM +0200, Thomas Schorpp wrote:
dann frazier schrieb:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:46:18PM +, tom schorpp wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686
Version: 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Silent
. I've also found that bumping YY_READ_BUF_SIZE up to 16384
seems to workaround the problem - but that may just be putting it back
into hiding.
My understanding of flex's codebase is nearly non-existant, but
filter.c:filter_apply_chain() looks like a reasonable place to suspect
an issue.
--
dann
.. that's strange - it works for me. Can you unpack the initramfs to
make sure the bnx2 files have been included? (see initramfs-tools(8)
for a cpio command to do this).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/firmware-removal/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:47:09AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 17:05 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
hey Ben,
I got around to testing a build from the source you reference in your
blog[1] today - but it appears that the e100 patch in place simply
removes the firmware
to install a kernel w/o an applicable bootloader
under certain conditions, so no dependency is warranted. Just be
careful not to remove your bootloader! :)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=1e675381c2c443e84ba7bea055017ded1ac8f816
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:23:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:29:05PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Because this affects a significant number of symbols, it doesn't look
to me like a safe thing to ignore w/ the #ifdef __GENKSYMS__ trick, so
its looking like we need
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 04:14:41PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:23:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:29:05PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Because this affects a significant number of symbols, it doesn't look
to me like a safe thing
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92l
Severity: important
Tags: patch
A coworker reported a lenny install failure today. Turns out he had
asked the installer to run mkinitramfs w/ MODULES=dep, which I'd never
tried before:
dl380g5:/home/dannf# mkinitramfs-kpkg -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.26-1-686
directed you to. Obviously that's not the same as being in the
archive proper, but that's not going to happen till after lenny.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:08:59AM -0700, Aaron D. Johnson wrote:
dann frazier writes:
I've got a theory - can you search the /var/log/kern.log* files on
this guest for any Oops messages?
No Oopses going back to 3 Dec:
ajohn...@spielplatz:~$ sudo zgrep -i oops /var/log/kern.log
hey,
I plan to do an upload to p-u of both stable kernels tomorrow. Let me
know if you have additional changes you'd like to try and get in. Note
that there will likely be further p-u uploads before r7, but this
should help get the pending changes some testing in the meantime.
--
dann frazier
sure our fix is correct?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:37:28PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:41:54AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:01:17AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Jurij Smakov (ju...@wooyd.org):
Please enable them for the next upload (which
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508489
Appreciated, thanks!
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, assuming
it supports your system.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:26:33AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
Patches which solves the xfs loading bug on parisc has been accepted
upstream.
Mainstream Kernel 2.6.29 will contain the fix.
Description of the problem:
http
security
issues, and a regression fix for a missing rtc interface on ia64. I
can get those committed today.
Is the kernel team ok with an upload tomorrow? Bastian: would you
have time to do it? I can fill in if you don't. If we have consensus,
I can notify -boot/-release of our plans.
--
dann
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:40:50PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:46:29AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
We have various fixes queued up for -13 and, from talking to Otavio,
it looks like we have a short window (~1 day) to do another kernel
upload w/o delaying d-i
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:57:12PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:46:29AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
We have various fixes queued up for -13 and, from talking to Otavio,
it looks like we have a short window (~1 day) to do another kernel
upload w/o delaying d-i
triage
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
)
- several other fixes of = important severity from Moritz's recent
bug triage
Are XVR drivers (#508108) going to be included? If not, please, reconsider
as they've been successfully tried and tested in several different kernel
builds and on different HW.
Thanks.
Yep!
--
dann frazier
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 07:06:20AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting dann frazier (da...@debian.org):
hey,
I wanted to give -release -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
d-i channel, delays in the d-i
for some
reason. You might want to run that hook manually to see what the
problem might be.
I'd also suggest asking these kinds of questions on debian-user - that
is a more suitable place to ask questions like this.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
: [ 8142.528737] eth1: New link status: Connected (0001)
kernel: [ 8189.211424] eth1: New link status: AP Out of Range (0004)
kernel: [ 8189.310660] eth1: New link status: AP In Range (0005)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
a snapshot 2.6.28 build?
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [lguest] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/Documentation/lguest'
make: *** [debian/stamp/build/kernel] Error 2
Try:
apt-get install zlib1g-dev
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
/projects/rt/older/
Debian original source from:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/
Debian patches from: http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/
Thanks in advance,
Alex
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
. Ordering won't change that.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the fixed new one? Not in stable?!
It is in stable-proposed-updates:
http://wiki.debian.org/StableProposedUpdates
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.html
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
might install this package. But, it
probably makes sense to recommend zlib1g-dev (like we do gcc) or - if
its not needed in most builds - suggest it like we do ncurses-dev.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
creating a module-source package which is compatible with
module-assistant and drops the resulting module in the updates
dir. That won't make the driver available at install time, but its
better than not working at all :)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 04:49 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that one side-effect of dropping the minor number in the source
package name is that we won't be able to have one kernel in sid and one
in testing and be able to use sid as an update
-patch/kernel-modules package to track kernel-source uploads came
up.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 10:07 -0400, Brett Smith wrote:
If that's the case, I'd be happy to talk to upstream myself about it.
Talking to the SATA maintainers would probably be my best bet; if you could
suggest the best way to reach them, I'd appreciate it.
fyi, see the MAINTAINERS file in the
hey,
Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what is in the works[2] for a security
update.
All the patches referenced in -16 are already in svn for 2.6.8-15sarge1,
so looks
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 19:26 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what is in the works[2] for a security
update.
fyi, similar issue w
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:32 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:26:26PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
Sorry if this has already been discussed; but I noticed that although
2.6.8-16 is the latest version of kernel-source in sarge[1],
2.6.8-15sarge1 appears to be what
Horms said he had merged in up to 2.6.12.2, so I went through the
2.6.12.3 changes. Here's my notes - I've committed the three I marked
applicable.
[PATCH] If ACPI doesn't find an irq listed, don't accept 0 as a valid PCI irq.
- Fixes a bug introduced between 2.6.8 2.6.12
[PATCH] revert
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:49 +0900, Horms wrote:
New batch, got to run to a meeting, will finish off later.
--
Horms
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/stable-queue.git;a=tree;h=931f32e10913cbb20170dd90623aacb2139a8129;hb=1f61f31059270a271c6fcb7c3c5782dda85238eb;f=queue
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:34 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
unstable = new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:11 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Why not use linux-image-foo instead of kernel-image-foo, w/ an
appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:43 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12
backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that;
however, if people want
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:04 +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
Referring to
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html
(thanks dannf) I notice that the following kernel-tree versions
are in use in Sarge:
2.4.27-10: alpha, i386, ia64, powerpc (latest)
2.4.27-9: powerpc
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 21:04 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:11:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
This is not an appropriate upgrade path as this headers don't ask apt to
install the new package.
Even with the
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:29 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
The problems is not Dell PowerEdge specific. My TYAN Tiger-i7320-S5350
(standard dual xeon server from www.ipc2u.com) also reports only 3.5GB
after booting the Sarge 2.6 kernel :-( The BIOS reports full 4GB.
So if it does
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 07:50 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:21:37PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 21:04 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:11:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 08:44 -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
Based on some answers you have given to me, it appears that I need
to come up with a udeb package for the three module files (.ko) files
that I need to load (or perhaps three separate udeb packages). I also
need to come up with a
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 20:22 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I just upgraded the kernel on the machine in question to the kernel
found at
URL:ftp://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb,
and the airo driver worked there too. :)
Please
tags 322935 + patch
thanks
I'm not sure if we want to do this or not, but here's a patch that
should do it.
Index: control.tree.in
===
--- control.tree.in (revision 3898)
+++ control.tree.in (working copy)
@@ -23,3 +23,13 @@
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 16:34 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:31:33AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Horms schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:14:30PM -0700, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Broken
Does anyone in the kernel team know whats up here?
-4 is already in, so not
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi,
Here is my proposal for the immediate future of 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
I'm pretty comforatble with the shape of both of them in SVN,
and its probably a good time to think about some releases -
security bugs keep coming in all the time, but I
forwarded 323289 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3869
tags 323289 + upstream
thanks
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 07:53 -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
Dann Frazier suggested to me to try the 2.6.12 kernel image in
unstable (linux-image-2.6.12-2) on the system with the
Intel 88e8050 Chip NIC
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 14:22 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It won't actually break d-i when installing etch, because the dependency of
kernel-latest on these kernels will prevent the removal of the necessary
binary packages from testing.
It will break d-i installs of sid, until the point that
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 16:12 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
linux-2.6 deprecates kernel-latest, afaict. It provides the same binary
packages as transition packages that depend on the s/kernel/linux/
equivalents.
The remaining problem is that the version string used by the linux-2.6
transition
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 11:06 +0900, Horms wrote:
2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security
- source packages now up on http://packages.vergenet.net/pending/
- need feedback from security team on how to coordinate this release
- please make packages available and publish a URL in the mean
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 10:54 +0900, Horms wrote:
3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security
- source packages not prepared yet. I hope to do that today
I am working on this now
- source, i386 and powerpc images are now up on
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 08:53 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:12:39PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
linux-2.6 deprecates kernel-latest, afaict. It provides the same binary
packages as transition packages that depend on the s/kernel/linux/
equivalents.
They also
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 16:36 +0300, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
Hi all,
For a few recent versions of the Debian patch I've been getting the
following when trying to compile the 2.6.12 kernel
(linux-source-2.6.12-5) with
make-kpkg --added-patches debian kernel_image:
test -f applied_patches rm -f
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 11:30 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 05:37:38PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
kernel-latest-2.6-i386 provides:
kernel-image-2.6-386_101_i386.deb
linux-2.6 provides:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-5_i386.deb
2.6.12-5 101, so an upgrade won't take
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:21 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:30 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Horms wrote:
2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security
3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security
I can do sparc builds mid-next-week; probably not before then, unless
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:21 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:30 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Horms wrote:
2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security
3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security
I can
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:21 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:30 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Horms wrote:
2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:21 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:30 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 06:37 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
2.4.27 is building.
And done:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel/sparc/2.4.27
Works fine on my sparc64.
Thanks, Norbert
The 2.6.8
We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
I can try to do hppa this afternoon; any word on m68k, mips s390?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
error message when it has not been passed a
kernel-tree revision.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
I can try to do hppa this afternoon; any word on m68k, mips s390?
Security Team,
Is there a way we can take advantage
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 20:30 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
I can try to do hppa this afternoon
701 - 800 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo
