On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 09:36:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:20:53PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I'm not aware of any well-formed consensus yet - though there are
several ideas. I'll caveat this by saying I don't follow Xen
development at all, and didn't
for this?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:22:19AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 09:36:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:20:53PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I'm not aware of any well-formed
!
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#493946, can you confirm?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/grub/menu.lst a 8250.nr_uarts=5 option.
Thanks for following up
I am coming from a FreeBSD background where kernel tweaks like this one
are very well documented. Where's the place to seek similar help in
Debian?
/usr/share/doc/linux-doc-ver/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.gz
--
dann
/~dannf/bugs/498309/
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that break d-i (e.g., loop-aes for crypt
partitions?)
Also - what makes the ABI of the hppa kernel any less stable than the
other architectures?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rtc_device_unregister
rtc_irq_register
rtc_irq_set_freq
rtc_irq_set_state
rtc_irq_unregister
rtc_month_days
rtc_read_alarm
rtc_read_time
rtc_set_alarm
rtc_set_mmss
rtc_set_time
rtc_time_to_tm
rtc_tm_to_time
rtc_update_irq
rtc_valid_tm
rtc_year_days
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
, the abi issue really isn't an issue for me.
This doesn't just affect proprietary modules.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:43:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:44:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:52:58PM +, Bastian Blank wrote:
+ * [hppa] No stable ABI, disable external modules completely.
Would this prevent the conglomerate
://bugzilla.kernel.org. Did this start occuring after a kernel
upgrade? If so, you might be able to help find the problem by
bisecting - see http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelReportingBugs for
more information.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Ralf Gross wrote:
dann frazier schrieb:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:02:41AM +0200, Ralf Gross wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Version: 2.6.18+6etch3
I've lost 2 xfs filesystems this weekend after adding lots of acls to many
files
now, but I didn't run into this problem with
the build test.)
How do I fix this?
add an ignore gfs2_* pattern as i doubt that this in high use on m68k.
I agree, where does this pattern go?
see config/hppa/defines for an example
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:11:20PM -0300, Emiliano Castagnari wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:53 PM, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, that patch went in years ago. This is a more current report, but
might not be the same thing:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:09:00AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6695
2.6.26 is in lenny/sid - can someone test it to confirm?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
://kyle.mcmartin.ca/.plan/index.php/2008/09/07/config_printk_time-what-is-time/
[2]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=1a189c07f9f65305442d6e99efac9ac44f86bc04
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
to
verify? I've prepared a prebuilt image if you'd prefer to test that:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/500158
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-by: Chris Wright
This commit changes file arch/x86/kernel/tsc_32.c
Great, thanks Bruce! Can you file a bug on bugzilla.kernel.org with
this information and let us know the number so we can track it?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
, if there are no objections
from the kernel team.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at parisc-linux.org
hey Matthias!
Are you sure the installer is using 2.6.26-6? This looks a lot like
#499458 which should've been fixed in 2.6.26-6 (fixed it for me, at
least).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 07:20:35AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-02 17:55]:
Are you sure the installer is using 2.6.26-6? This looks a lot like
#499458 which should've been fixed in 2.6.26-6 (fixed it for me, at
least).
Note that he wrote
15.28.1.6.
+(closes: #494703)
+
+ -- dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:58:37 -0600
+
firmware-nonfree (0.12) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove Intel Wireless 3945 (old style) firmware.
Index: debian/rules.defs
Source: tgt
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
tgt runs dh_testroot in the build rule. I believe this violates
section 4.9 of Debian Policy which states:
The build target must not do anything that might require root
privilege.
Relevant piece of build log follows:
[...]
/usr/bin/make -C
important,
not yet reviewed by dannf.
ACK; I'll look at this soon.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100219194508.ga17...@lackof.org
.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100305164723.ga24...@lackof.org
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:35:05PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:45:08PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:02:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:01:14PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26
A coworker was seeing the same symptoms on a system from the
same-era loaned me the system to debug. The issue ended up being
due to a change in the SRAT table, and a backport of the following
fixed it for me.
I've committed it to the lenny branch - would you be able to test it?
commit
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:43:45PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-21lenny4
Severity: critical
drbd fails to load and there goes my failover high available cluster...
*t
well, crap - we ignored that ABI change because google showed only an
old/deprecated
months.
Until then, your customers are welcome to add proposed-updates to
their sources.list. Builds for all other architectures should appear
over the next several days.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
tags 573490 + patch
affects 573490 drbd8-source
thanks
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:38:23PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:43:45PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-21lenny4
Severity: critical
drbd fails to load and there goes my
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 04:06:41PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] dann frazier
| A coworker was seeing the same symptoms on a system from the
| same-era loaned me the system to debug. The issue ended up being
| due to a change in the SRAT table, and a backport of the following
| fixed
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+drbd8 (2:8.0.14-2+lenny1) stable-security; urgency=high
+
+ * Update for connector API change in linux-2.6_2.6.26-21lenny4
+(Closes: #573490)
+ * Restrict netlink calls to users with CAP_SYS_ADMIN (CVE Requested)
+
+ -- dann frazier da...@debian.org Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:47:53
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:31AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
I've also been bitten by this bug - noticed it last Friday and it
doesn't seem to be fixed this morning.
Is there an ETA on a fix with packages?
Packages are now available in the security repo (an apt-get upgrade
should suffice).
version (2.6.26-6+lenny1) in
stable = new version (2.6-26-6+lenny2) targeted at proposed-updates.
Looks like a typo in the version string (2.6-26 vs. 2.6.26) - will
correct and reupload.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:50:58PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-03-15, dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:31AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
I've also been bitten by this bug - noticed it last Friday and it
doesn't seem to be fixed this morning
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:39:58PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:13:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:50:58PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-03-15, dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:31AM
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:45:13PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:30:31AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
I've also been bitten by this bug - noticed it last Friday and it
doesn't seem to be fixed this morning.
Is there an ETA on a fix
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:45:46PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:39:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:39:58PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:13:06PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
As mentioned in [1], the vserver featureset is planned to be removed
from the Debian linux kernel after the squeeze release. Debian suggests that
users consider migrating vserver systems to either the LXC (Linux Containers)
features of the upstream kernel
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-03-30, dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
drbd maintainers,
As you no doubt know, linux-modules-extra has been dropped for
squeeze. The recommended[1] direction for building out-of-tree module
is to either
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:31:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
drbd maintainers,
As you no doubt know, linux-modules-extra has been dropped for
squeeze. The recommended[1] direction for building out-of-tree module
is to either:
a) get merged into linux-2.6
b) use the dkms framework
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:02:00AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:02:22PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-03-30, dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
drbd maintainers,
As you
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:39:47AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:09:54PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
My plan is therefore to:
1) Commit these changes for inclusion in the next linux-2.6 upload
2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request
).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
(Note that the build server is offline at the moment)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
report at all - perhaps you
could post such stream of consciousness comments to a personal blog?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the 'dmesg' output from the Red Hat system?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
export svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/releases/linux-2.6/2.6.18.dfsg.1-22
svn export
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/releases/linux-2.6/2.6.18.dfsg.1-22etch2
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:18:54PM +0200, jazz wrote:
After a lot of issue i'm finally about to test your fix !
The build server still appears to be down ... correct ?
Correct. You can grab a build from here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/530636/
--
dann frazier
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:51:33PM +0200, jazz wrote:
I ran the test kernel for a day with no oops (fyi, it used to oops in
about 30 min. max).
Great, thanks for testing. This fix should be included in the next
stable release.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:30:04AM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 17:06 +0200, Jürgen Kertz wrote:
Hello!
Thank you all for explaining the matter to me!
I finally understand why there has to be this non-free firmware package.
Hopefully there will be a convenient
it is an upstream problem I'd suggest trying
the latest upstream kernel and, if the problem still exists,
reporting a bug at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
hey,
Can you test this kernel and report back the results?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/515741/
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 07:48:21AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 515741 marc.ko...@mni.fh-giessen.de
Bug #515741 {Done: dann frazier da...@debian.org}
[linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64] flock() error with ocfs2/dlm
Owner recorded
upstream kernel right? If the problem
is reproducible with upstream kernels, you really need to report it
there, and ideally with results/screen shots from 2.6.32-rc1 or
2.6.31.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
kernel.org. If not, just report the issue upstream and
note your kernel version (and include lspci output as Ben suggested).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
and then which sub category.
IO/Storage-Serial ATA I would guess.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, vhdr);
if (!bh)
--- END ---
Ben.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
if this would help:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9d2e9d66a3f032667934144cd61c396ba49f090d
Would you be able to test that?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
0B0A 2626 D49C BFC6 1C18 1619 74E4 C259 E0E8
`. `'` HP: http://debalance.funpic.de, Skype: philipp-huebner
`- ICQ: 235-524-440, Jabber: der_scha...@jabber.org
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
that we may want to bake those changes
in p-u first.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
?
The correct path is to get the necessary changes accepted upstream. We
can then backport the necessary fixes into new kernel releases.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, should we ask them to
somehow start setting this tunable themselves (e.g., by dropping in an
/etc/sysctl.d file)? Anyone know what Ubuntu is doing here?
[1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel-sec/dsa-texts/2.6.26-19lenny1
(currently awaiting 1 more arch build)
--
dann frazier
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:37:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 13:24 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:37:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I've collected quite a few bug fixes for 2.6.26-20. It seems like it
might be worth uploading to stable
-package basis. Do wine/dosemu have plans to do this? I wonder if
we should consider including something like that in stable?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 02:54:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
The kernel team is discussing the possibility of increase the default
value of mmap_min_addr in lenny (it has already been done for
sid). Obviously this has implications for the wine and dosemu packages
(are there others
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:04:37PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
any objections against uploading 2.6.31 to unstable tomorrow?
fyi, ia64 is working fine (though there are no builds appearing in
experimental for whatever reason)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel
Version: 2.6.28-1
This appears to have gone upstream in 2.6.27, so its first appearance
in debian would've been 2.6.28-1 (we skipped 2.6.27).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
hey,
Here's a build that includes Ben's patch. If you have this hardware,
(or, for that matter, any hardware that uses igb) please test report
back your results.
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/522922
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
as it gets built, signed and uploaded.
As far
as I can tell, #542250 affects amd64 as well as i386/i686.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
of the backports.org people monitor this list -
you might try contacting them directly.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
jiffies = jiffies_64;
-endif
+#endif
SECTIONS
{
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, quietly downgrade
it.
Or downgrade it w/ a pointer to this document, so it is clearly not personal.
If a submitter has done something stupid, request that they undo that
and report back. 'Sorry', and 'please' make a big difference in tone.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
There is a potential fix for this issue in the 2.6.26-20 kernel in
proposed-updates. Can someone who has seen this issue please verify
the fix?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 04:37:06PM +0100, amuel...@targz.de wrote:
hey,
after 5 days of testing we got no further error messages and system did
not hang. So I assume that the bug is fixed. (used your testkernel)
Thanks in Advance!
Great, thanks for the verification.
--
dann frazier
kernels and hope I could help out with that.
Thanks for the offer and the testing, but builds are done
automatically by the buildd infrastructure, not by the kernel
team. The issues w/ 2.6.31 should be worked out soon.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ
build until these changes are completed.
You can always do your own build from the source in the archive, or
from what is in svn.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/asound/card0/pcm0p/oss. It was working the day before I updated.
Can you revert to the 2.6.26-19lenny1 kernel and retest? I don't see
anything new in 19lenny2 that could obviously break this.
It would also be useful to verify w/o the nvidia driver loaded, if
possible.
--
dann frazier
to confirm that we're looking in the
right place.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
autoconf-scripts (notably strace) try to compile this program to
detect linux/netlink.h and consequently fail. Please revert the change that
remove the sub-includes from linux/socket.h
Thanks for testing!
Does anyone have an alternate fix, or should we just revert this for
now?
--
dann
maintaner of linux-image-2.6.30-bpo.2-686 is
Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
The kernel team does not maintain the kernel in backports.org.
You can use the sid/squeeze binaries directly on lenny though.
So who could reenable CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT?
See #516079.
--
dann frazier
The igb driver in stable currently supports these device:
#define E1000_DEV_ID_82575EB_COPPER 0x10A7
#define E1000_DEV_ID_82575EB_FIBER_SERDES 0x10A9
#define E1000_DEV_ID_82575GB_QUAD_COPPER 0x10D6
I obtained access to cards containing the first two chips[1] and did
some basic
We have several pending changes, plus we need to merge in the latest
DSAs. I'll plan on uploading tomorrow, so let me know if you have any
changes pending that might need more time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:02:25PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
We have several pending changes, plus we need to merge in the latest
DSAs. I'll plan on uploading tomorrow, so let me know if you have any
changes pending that might need more time.
The p-u processing isn't working at the moment
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-22
Severity: serious
Tags: patch, lenny
I have a sparc that fails to boot a lenny kernel.
The issue was reported upstream by another Debian user here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/13092
And was resolved by the following patch:
commit
-be4248ad1af4
read-only
initrd=/initrd.img.old
(Now to reboot, to make sure it actually works...)
--
dann frazier
Index: debian/linux-base.postinst
===
--- debian/linux-base.postinst (revision 15638)
+++ debian/linux
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:12:54AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 21:56 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 16:42 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-12
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
/usr/sbin/elilo didn't like
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:52:34AM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
I haven't been able to reproduce this issue on my systems, for
whatever reason. Would you be able to verify that this build fixes it
for you?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/573071/
Sorry, i didn't mentioned that i'm
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:03:25PM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
Am Dienstag, 11. Mai 2010 schrieb dann frazier:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:52:34AM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
I haven't been able to reproduce this issue on my systems, for
whatever reason. Would you be able to verify
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:43:00PM +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-22lenny1
Severity: important
Hi,
I get no DHCP offers on the r8169 device since the upgrade to 2.6.26-22lenny1.
Reverting to 2.6.26-22 does not fix the problem.
Reverting to
[Please keep the bug # in the CC]
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08:09AM +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report. I don't see anything in -22 that looks like it
would've affected your setup, but in -22lenny1 there is a security fix
for the r8169 driver. Would you mind
beyond the end of the page, but fixing this doesn't resolve the problem.
I am still experimenting with using equivalent aliasing. It does
help to flush in ptep_set_wrprotect.
Dave
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:03:07AM +0900, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
Modestas Vainius wrote:
Note that Debian's buildds run a UP kernel, so as soon as those fixes
go upstream we can pull them in. Thanks for all your work here!
Well, as long as this is unfixed or at least common, I don't see how
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:44:55PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:21 AM, dann frazier da...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:03:07AM +0900, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
Modestas Vainius wrote:
Note that Debian's buildds run a UP kernel, so as soon as those fixes
The kernel in proposed-updates (2.6.26-23) includes a couple of
security fixes for the gfs2 filesystem. I've performed some smoke
testing in a VM, but I'm looking for users who might have actual
(non-production) clusters to do some pre-release testing.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I was able to easily reproduce it by running 'make check'. The first
test case (gcore) reliably fails with either a system hang or an MCA.
Bisect shows that it was introduced by the following commit:
62eede62dafb4a6633eae7ffbeb34c60dba5e7b1 is the first bad commit
commit
/+archive/ppa
[1] http://users.on.net/~ckolivas/kernel/
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/424927 see
the linux-rename patch
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:13:00PM -0600, Scott Barker wrote:
After applying the latest kernel package, all of my VMs started just fine as
well. All i386.
Well, this is good news I suppose.. personally I'd rather have
something 100% reproducing than intermittently failing :(
--
dann frazier
hey Ian,
I haven't seen any reports of xen problems w/ the latest lenny DSA
that added the guard page code. I looked at backporting the 3 patches
from Linus - but the mlock patch touches code that didn't exist in
.26, so I'm wondering if that patch is just not needed.
--
dann frazier
901 - 1000 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo
