On 12/29/2010 05:59 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk):
>
>>> If you choose not to update the database automatically, you can do it by
>>> hand
>>> by running the command geoip-database-contrib_update as root.
>>
>> That looks okay.
>
> I'd recommend quotin
Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk):
> > If you choose not to update the database automatically, you can do it by
> > hand
> > by running the command geoip-database-contrib_update as root.
>
> That looks okay.
I'd recommend quoting the program name (with single quotes, which we
standardi
On 12/29/2010 07:40 PM, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> Thomas, if you don't mind, i still would like to tweak the text a bit.
>
> Most of your changes look to me like definite improvements, except:
>
>>> This does not happen under GRUB 2 in Squeeze. Instead, the non-Xen
>>> k
On 12/28/2010 11:55 PM, Justin B Rye wrote:
> an "uploader" (or some such). Maybe just:
>
> Description: GeoLite binary database downloader
>
> Or then again maybe I'm trying too hard and we'd be better of with:
>
> Description: downloader for the GeoLite binary database
>
I'd like to have
Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Do we know *how* it's broken? It always works for me - is that
>> because I don't use GNOME?
>>
> It removes packages instead of upgrading them. Or just never finds an
> upgrade path and bails out. Or takes 10 broken propositions before it
> finds something vaguely acce
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:00:49 +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Well the recommendation changed because aptitude's behaviour on upgrades
> > from one release to the next was already broken for etch→lenny, and
> > isn't better for lenny→squeeze.
>
> Do we know *how* it's br
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Well the recommendation changed because aptitude's behaviour on upgrades
> from one release to the next was already broken for etch→lenny, and
> isn't better for lenny→squeeze.
Do we know *how* it's broken? It always works for me - is that
because I don't use GNOME?
Meanw
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:40:46 +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>> Why would you do that?
> >>
> >> I can't tell you the rationale; I'm just trying to follow the
> >> recommendations in the paragraph Adam pointed at*:
> >
> > I think mostly it means aptitude's curses inter
Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> Why would you do that?
>>
>> I can't tell you the rationale; I'm just trying to follow the
>> recommendations in the paragraph Adam pointed at*:
>
> I think mostly it means aptitude's curses interface. But in any case
> for installing a single package it doesn't matter.
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Thomas, if you don't mind, i still would like to tweak the text a bit.
Most of your changes look to me like definite improvements, except:
>> This does not happen under GRUB 2 in Squeeze. Instead, the non-Xen
>> kernel will boot by default.
>
> This behavior changed
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 00:07:15 +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Justin B Rye wrote:
> >> for the immediately subsequent xen 4.0 install we should be telling
> >> them to switch back to aptitude.
> >
> > Why would you do that?
>
> I can't tell you the rationale; I'm just t
[ Dropping debian-release@ as that does not need to be discussed there,
adding debian-doc, they edit the release notes ]
Hi,
Thomas, if you don't mind, i still would like to tweak the text a bit.
> > [...many English corrections...]
> 4.7.4. Xen upgrades
>
> In Lenny, if you installed Xen, th
12 matches
Mail list logo
